Teaching More by Lecturing Less

Abstract

We carried out an experiment to determine whether student learning gains in a large, traditionally taught, upper-division lecture course in developmental biology could be increased by partially changing to a more interactive classroom format. In two successive semesters, we presented the same course syllabus using different teaching styles: in fall 2003, the traditional lecture format; and in spring 2004, decreased lecturing and addition of student participation and cooperative problem solving during class time, including frequent in-class assessment of understanding. We used performance on pretests and posttests, and on homework problems to estimate and compare student learning gains between the two semesters. Our results indicated significantly higher learning gains and better conceptual understanding in the more interactive course. To assess reproducibility of these effects, we repeated the interactive course in spring 2005 with similar results. Our findings parallel results of similar teaching-style comparisons made in other disciplines. On the basis of this evidence, we propose a general model for teaching large biology courses that incorporates interactive engagement and cooperative work in place of some lecturing, while retaining course content by demanding greater student responsibility for learning outside of class.

What are Middle School Students Talking About During Clicker Questions? Characterizing Small-Group Conversations Mediated by Classroom Response Systems

“…When instructors use the peer instruction approach described above, the frequency of correct answers often increases after peer discussion (Mazur 1997;Crouch and Mazur 2001;Knight and Wood 2005;Smith et al 2009). Two commonly discussed hypotheses could explain this observation: (1) active engagement of students during peer discussion with peers leads to increased conceptual understanding, or (2) students simply choose the answer most strongly advocated by adjacent peers who seem to know the correct answer.…”

The evaluation of i-SIDRA – a tool for intelligent feedback – in a course on the anatomy of the locomotor system

“…The active participation of students is a typical feature of CRS lecture delivery, especially for large classes in which the interactivity can be increased [38]. The interaction between faculty and students is also improved by using CRS [42]. Moreover, a summative assessment combined with CRS can be an incentive for attendance [43].…”

Is video-case an efficient tool to complement the practical learning in real contexts? Effects on satisfaction and performance in Social Work Degree students

“…However, we consider -as well as other authors cited before-, that these methods will be educational to the extent that are evaluated, selected and integrated by the lecturer in a specific educational context (Knight & Wood, 2005). Increasingly, researchers underline the mediating role of communicative practices based on technological mediation (García-Carbonell, Rising, Montero, & Watts, 2001;Kendon, 2004;Thorne & Reinhardt, 2008;Zheng, Young, & Wagner, 2009in Masats & Dooly, 2011.…”