Scholars who have embraced the social (Berlin, 1988) and the global (Hesford, 2006) turns in rhetoric and composition are seeking comparative-historical frames for understanding how communication mediates social roles within sites of conflict. Since the publication of Millennials Rising: The Next Generation, it is my observation that communication about Millennials is a significant site of conflict in the United States. While scholars in rhetoric have explored how age bias affects non-traditional students who enter college later in adulthood (Bowen, 2011; Crow, 2006; Grabill and Pigg, 2012; Swacha, 2017), I am curious about age bias against the young, where scholars and professionals are using communication to construct knowledge about their relationship to Millennials in academic and professional contexts. From this curiosity, four questions inspired my dissertation: 1) How are Millennials discussed in academic and professional contexts? 2) How does millennial function rhetorically in business contexts and in rhetoric and composition? 3) What methods can be devised to examine and compare communications about generational differences? 4) How do Millennials define themselves? In this dissertation I seek answers to these questions. CHAPTER ONE-MILLENNIALS, METHODS, AND EMBRACING SOCIAL AND GLOBAL TURNS IN RHETORIC AND COMPOSITION As both an activist and an instructor of composition, I frequently work with students in the millennial age group. In our casual moments, these Millennials tell me stories about how their instructors, managers, or supervisors make assumptions about them simply because they are Millennials. These assumptions, Millennials feel, stereotype them in pernicious ways that affect how successful they can be in academic and professional contexts. As an older millennial scholar of rhetoric and composition, and as a graduate student, instructor, and co-administrator of ISUComm's learning management systems, my body exists both within and outside these conversations, and my experience corroborates Millennials' suspicions. What I hear from fellow instructors and faculty is that their millennial students can use any technology with ease, and yet Millennials' aptitude with technology means they are endlessly distracted by it, if not subjugated to it. Moreover, I have worked with university administrators who feel like students' expectations from education stem from Millennials' feelings of entitlement, where students want everything available to them easily, quickly, and without compromise. The more aware I became of the commonality of millennial stereotypes, the more curious I became to this tension between Millennials and previous generations. It is my curiosity about the rhetoric of inter-generational conflict that inspires my dissertation. Coined by Neil Howe and William Strauss in their book Millennials Rising, Millennials are defined as children born between the late 1970s and early 2000s. My dissertation examines Millennials as a topic and a site of rhetorical inquiry. I aim to fill a gap in unders...