2013
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team Syntegrity® as a Tool for Efficient Teamwork: An Experimental Evaluation in a Business Simulation

Abstract: This study evaluates Team Syntegrity® (TS) as a tool to improve the efficiency of teamwork in solving complex problems by means of stimulating collaboration and developing cross‐fertilization and creativity. Some evidence suggests that TS has good results for individuals who participate in the process; however, no empirical research has occurred on the consequences for teamwork. Therefore, we apply this methodology to a group of students who then participate in a business simulation course. We then compare the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. To see a study in which we did an empirical evaluation of the benefits derived from using TS in a group-decision context, see: Martín-Cruz et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. To see a study in which we did an empirical evaluation of the benefits derived from using TS in a group-decision context, see: Martín-Cruz et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has 12 vertices each connecting 5 edges [14]. The key purpose of TS application is to improve the effectiveness of the decisions through: generating a high level of participation among individuals concerned with the problem; providing non-hierarchical structures and communication systems; using the diversity and wealth of knowledge available to each member of the group, as well as the knowledge generated by their mutual interactions; creating a collective awareness and consensus on the central issue under consideration [30,31].…”
Section: Team Syntegritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published empirical examples of applications of TS are limited and mainly report on applications in the single organisation domain (e.g., Schecter, 1991;Holmberg 1997;Ahmad, 1999;Espinosa, 2000;Mejía & Espinosa, 2007;Martín-Cruz, Martín-Pérez, Pérez-Ríos, & Velasco-Jiménez, 2014). Published examples of its application outside of single organisational settings include world governance (e.g., Walsh, 1996), city or area planning (e.g., White & Lee, 2009;Diringer, 2010;Holmberg & Löfstedt, 2011), e-customs implementation (e.g., Henriksen &Rukanova, 2011), andinformation andcommunication technologies (e.g., Pérez Ríos &Jiménez, 2015).…”
Section: Team Syntegritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of TS argue that it is a useful tool for: (a.) assisting effective group decision making round complex problems (Leonard, 1996;Holmberg, 1997;Schwaninger, 2002;Espinosa & Harnden, 2007;Diringer, 2010;Reissberg, 2011;Pérez Ríos, 2012;Martín-Cruz et al, 2014;Pérez Ríos and Jiménez, 2015); (b.) promoting synergy in ideas which emerge from the total capacity of individual participants expertise (Leonard, 1996;Holmberg, 1997;Schwaninger, 2002;Pérez Ríos, 2012); (c.) supporting democratic dialogue -since the structure of the protocol supports non-hierarchical participation and connectivity amongst diverse participants (Leonard, 1996;Walsh, 1996;Holmberg, 1997;Schwaninger, 2002;Espinosa & Harnden, 2007;Pérez Ríos, 2012); (d.) encouraging self-reflection of participants through the role of team critics (Schwaninger, 2002); (e.) supporting high levels of participation (Pérez Ríos, 2012).…”
Section: Team Syntegritymentioning
confidence: 99%