1992
DOI: 10.1177/053901892031003003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical innovation and the universities: divisions of labour in cosmopolitan technical regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they enable the codification of knowledge through making tacit knowledge explicit, such that localized knowledge is flushed out of the research system (Keating, Limoges, and Cambrosio 1999) through a process of "filtering" to determine what is in and what is out (Busch 2011). Thus, standards are the result of a shared or "cosmopolitan" technological regime within a domain of inquiry (Disco, Rip, and van der Meulen 1992) and help establish field-level expectations and practice. However, it is equally important to understand that a field of science is always on the move as new experimental techniques, instrumentation and materials are deployed to answer the very questions that earlier experiments threw up.…”
Section: Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they enable the codification of knowledge through making tacit knowledge explicit, such that localized knowledge is flushed out of the research system (Keating, Limoges, and Cambrosio 1999) through a process of "filtering" to determine what is in and what is out (Busch 2011). Thus, standards are the result of a shared or "cosmopolitan" technological regime within a domain of inquiry (Disco, Rip, and van der Meulen 1992) and help establish field-level expectations and practice. However, it is equally important to understand that a field of science is always on the move as new experimental techniques, instrumentation and materials are deployed to answer the very questions that earlier experiments threw up.…”
Section: Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view was amended with a sociological analysis of institutional and material structuration processes and how they linked up with cognitive structures to form "technological regimes" (Disco et al 1992, Rip 1992a. Socially negotiated and historically embedded technological performance criteria and institutional infrastructures were found to have restrictive effects on innovation, meaning that radical novelty could only emerge in "protected spaces" (van den…”
Section: Figure 1: Realising Governance As Co-production Of Epistemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academics can assimilate this into their normal way of life; their substantial funding and their mainstream research interests continue to be in the public sector (Morris, 2002b). There are examples from chemistry and engineering (Rip, 1997;Disco et al, 1992;Blumenthal et al, 1997) suggesting that biological scientists may not be typical in this respect. There is however also evidence of a choice of roles, with many preferring to remain academic, in outlook and in profession (Atkinson-Grosjean, 2005;Rosenberg and Nelson, 1994;Bird and Allen, 1989), and within life sciences indicative evidence of much pedestrian industryoriented research (Blumenthal et al, 1996(Blumenthal et al, , 1997Howells et al, 1998;Cohen et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Re-framing Of Working With Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%