2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1ya00052g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological innovation vs. tightening raw material markets: falling battery costs put at risk

Abstract: The reduction of battery costs is a key enabler for an economically viable transition towards a climate-neutral society. Despite market analysts being concerned about rising raw material prices, across forecasting...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 As other components of the price are prone to reduction because of technological advancements, the share of raw material costs in battery price could rise further. 12 Battery prices would thus become increasingly sensitive to the fluctuation of materials prices. We recommend the following measures to suppress large-scale market volatility.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 As other components of the price are prone to reduction because of technological advancements, the share of raw material costs in battery price could rise further. 12 Battery prices would thus become increasingly sensitive to the fluctuation of materials prices. We recommend the following measures to suppress large-scale market volatility.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 3a, Mauler el. calculated and evaluated raw material markets (lithium, manganese, cobalt, nickel, and graphite) in regard to future cell development [7]. Their roadmap study integrated both cost restrictions and material price expectations throughout 2030.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other relevant domestic materials with increased demand include iron (steel), aluminum, and rare-earth elements. The criticality of minerals and demand for them from low-carbon technologies, especially EVs and energy storage, will put significant pressure on supply chains [7]. Lithium, cobalt, and graphite carry additional risks, since future demand for them will be disproportionately greater than their current production capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cathode materials include Lithium Cobalt Oxide (LCO), Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), Lithium Manganese Oxide (LMO), Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminum Oxide (NCA), and Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (NMC), while two popular (commercialized) anode materials are: Graphite, and Lithium Titanate Oxide (LTO). Currently, about 85% of all EVs use NMC or NCA cathode (NMC accounts for about 65-70% and NCA accounts for about 15-20% as of 2020) [6], while LFP accounts for another 10-20% of EVs [7]. For the anodes, graphite comprises the predominant majority (>99%) of all EVs [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, about 85% of all EVs use NMC or NCA cathode (NMC accounts for about 65-70% and NCA accounts for about 15-20% as of 2020) [6], while LFP accounts for another 10-20% of EVs [7]. For the anodes, graphite comprises the predominant majority (>99%) of all EVs [7]. LCO was the cathode of choice for any application in the first decade after the introduction of Li-ion batteries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%