Technological Overall Concepts for Future-Oriented Roadmapping

Schuh, Günther; Wemhöner, Hedi; Orilski, Simon

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33923-3_7

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These centre around increased effectiveness of technological decisions, including increased reliability of information and improved strategic decision outcomes; improved efficiency and effectiveness of R&D outcomes; and increased capacity to work across the supply chain including customers and suppliers, resulting in more informed decision-making about innovation needs and markets (Schuh et al 2013). Sector-wide innovation can be facilitated through innovation road-mapping, which aims to foster industry renewal through anticipating and preparing for alternative futures.…”

Section: Editorialmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There has been large scale transfer of forestry assets from government to private ownership, with private investors now holding the majority of forestry assets, and governments accounting for just 19% of investment in new plantations in 2013-14 (ABARES 2015. Over the same timeframe, R&D capability has shrunk dramatically and become fragmented as R&D funding has declined (e.g.…”

Section: Editorialmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Innovation in the forest industry: ready or not!

Pinkard

O’Grady

2016

Australian Forestry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Editorialmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Editorialmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation in the forest industry: ready or not!

Pinkard

O’Grady

2016

Australian Forestry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Technology planning is chosen in case of already available knowledge and access to technologies and markets. Future projects are specified and visualized mostly in form of technology roadmaps, linking the product and technology level [7,13,27]. Technology development is focusing on the creation of technological knowledge and often linked to the product development and application scenarios [6,22,28].…”

Section: Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategy framework for technology platforms within the context of diversified companies

Schuh

Ryschka

2015

2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The significance of technology platforms as interconnected networks of technological knowledge is steadily growing in diversified companies. The reason is that technology platforms support diversified companies to handle the conflicting priorities of fulfilling the customer demand for individualized innovations, while generating company-wide technological synergies. Hence, the success of diversified companies can be significantly affected by technology platforms and a consistent framework that enables the description of technology platform strategies. In practice however, a low degree of systematization regarding the description of technology platforms and their strategies is noticeable, leading to unsustainable platform concepts. The reason is that there is no established opinion in theory about the relevant strategy elements and subsequently no cohesive strategy framework, which supports the description of technology platform strategies. Therefore, in this paper we develop a consistent strategy framework for technology platforms in diversified companies, in order to describe sustainable strategies for technology platforms

show abstract

“…There are, however, variations in emphasis (and challenges) when applying the approach at an innovation system or industrial levels. In contrast to firm-level technology roadmapping, innovation system-level exercises may involve even more complex analyses (with a more diverse set of stakeholders), more complex and longer term innovation system dynamics, and broader socio-political trends and drivers Isenmann, 2008;Schuh et al, 2013]. Furthermore, unlike firm-level roadmaps, where the stakeholders 'commissioning' the roadmap are often the same ones that will use the outputs, governmentcommissioned foresight exercises are often intended to generate an evidence base to be used by a range of different public sector actors (e.g., research and innovation agencies, research and technology organizations) for their individual strategic purposes Schuh et al, 2013].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast to firm-level technology roadmapping, innovation system-level exercises may involve even more complex analyses (with a more diverse set of stakeholders), more complex and longer term innovation system dynamics, and broader socio-political trends and drivers Isenmann, 2008;Schuh et al, 2013]. Furthermore, unlike firm-level roadmaps, where the stakeholders 'commissioning' the roadmap are often the same ones that will use the outputs, governmentcommissioned foresight exercises are often intended to generate an evidence base to be used by a range of different public sector actors (e.g., research and innovation agencies, research and technology organizations) for their individual strategic purposes Schuh et al, 2013]. In this context, the general challenge of ensuring outputs have the right level of detail, scope, and stakeholder confidence Schuh et al, 2013] to support the strategy development needs of the foresight evidence 'users' can become more difficult.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2021

Foresight and STI Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

is an international interdisciplinary peer-reviewed openaccess journal. It publishes original research articles, offering new theoretical insights and practice-oriented knowledge in important areas of strategic planning and the creation of science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy, and it examines possible and alternative futures in all human endeavors in order to make such insights available to the right person at the right time to ensure the right decision.The journal acts as a scientific forum, contributing to the interaction between researchers, policy makers, and other actors involved in innovation processes. It encompasses all facets of STI policy and the creation of technological, managerial, product, and social innovations. Foresight and STI Governance welcomes works from scholars based in all parts of the world. Topics covered include:• Foresight methodologies and best practices;• Long-term socioeconomic priorities for strategic planning and policy making;• Innovative strategies at the national, regional, sectoral, and corporate levels;• The development of National Innovation Systems;• The exploration of the innovation lifecycle from idea to market;• Technological trends, breakthroughs, and grand challenges;• Technological change and its implications for economy, policy-making, and society;• Corporate innovation management;• Human capital in STI; and many others.The target audience of the journal comprises research scholars, university professors, postgraduates, policy-makers, business people, the expert community, undergraduates, and others who are interested in S&T and innovation analyses, foresight studies, and policy issues.Foresight and STI Governance is published quarterly and distributed worldwide. It is an open-access electronic journal and is available online for free via: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/en/ The journal is included into the 1st quartile (Q1) of the Scopus Cite Score Rank in the fields: Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)

show abstract

Technological Overall Concepts for Future-Oriented Roadmapping

Cited by 7 publications

References 2 publications

Innovation in the forest industry: ready or not!

Innovation in the forest industry: ready or not!

Strategy framework for technology platforms within the context of diversified companies

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About