2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEM investigation of interfaces during cuprous island growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the Cu/Cu 2 O interfacial energy is the sum of misfit strain energy and chemical interaction energy of the interfacial region 27 . The lattice misfit between Cu and Cu 2 O is around 15%, implying a large interfacial strain energy, even though the strained structure can be relaxed to some extent by forming misfit dislocations 28 . The chemical interaction energy usually depends on the composition of contacting materials, but it is also modulated by nanostructured interfaces 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the Cu/Cu 2 O interfacial energy is the sum of misfit strain energy and chemical interaction energy of the interfacial region 27 . The lattice misfit between Cu and Cu 2 O is around 15%, implying a large interfacial strain energy, even though the strained structure can be relaxed to some extent by forming misfit dislocations 28 . The chemical interaction energy usually depends on the composition of contacting materials, but it is also modulated by nanostructured interfaces 29 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copper oxidation on this surface proceeds, for low oxygen partial pressures (P ∌ 10 −4 Torr), through the formation of islands which are epitaxial with the surface, i.e. Cu 2 O(100) || Cu(100) 113,115,231,233-236 and have 6 × 7 lattice misfit configuration 225,237 . These islands grow and coalesce with further oxygen deposition.…”
Section: Oxide Nano-islands: Cu(100)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those values are also lower than that observed values in the TEM image (Figure 8b). On the other way, considering the interplanar spacings d 1 and d 2 of two overlapping crystals, the d spacing of parallel moire’ fringes will be increased [51]. Even though the Cu will be mixed in the Ge 0.2 Se 0.8 in the filament region, however, the d spacing of Cu will be also increased, which may be overlapping of different Cu nanocrystal fringes or Cu and GeSe nanocrystal fringes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%