2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/791/2/96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Structure of the Intracluster Medium From Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics and Adaptive-Mesh Refinement Simulations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to observational results, this matches well with data from both Chandra and XMM-Newton, provided the temperatures are all sufficiently high, e.g., kT 3.5 keV. Hydrodynamical simulations have been used to calibrate T sl to the observed 'X-ray' temperatures and confirm the differences between various X-ray derived temperatures weightings (e.g., Mathiesen & Evrard 2001;Rasia et al 2014;Biffi et al 2016).…”
Section: X-ray Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…When compared to observational results, this matches well with data from both Chandra and XMM-Newton, provided the temperatures are all sufficiently high, e.g., kT 3.5 keV. Hydrodynamical simulations have been used to calibrate T sl to the observed 'X-ray' temperatures and confirm the differences between various X-ray derived temperatures weightings (e.g., Mathiesen & Evrard 2001;Rasia et al 2014;Biffi et al 2016).…”
Section: X-ray Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It is controlled by the mass bias factor, 1 − b, accounting for any difference between the X-ray mass proxies used to establish the scaling relations and the true (halo) mass: M X = (1 − b)M 500 . Such a difference could arise from cluster physics (such as a violation of hydrostatic equilibrium or temperature structure in the gas, Rasia et al 2006Rasia et al , 2012Rasia et al , 2014, from observational effects (e.g., instrumental calibration), or from selection effects biasing the X-ray samples relative to SZ-or mass-selected samples (Angulo et al 2012).…”
Section: The Cluster Mass Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…few times of 10 13 M and below as indicated by Le Brun et al (2014); McCarthy et al (2010) etc. Cluster core properties can also be effected by AGN feedback by quenching star formation, thus resulting change in X-ray emissions and related scaling laws (Rasia et al 2014;Le Brun et al 2014), therefore, becomes a subject of our future research. Above studies also show that both coolSF and coolSF+AGN feedback are producing far better results than the non-radiative simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%