2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2021.3050611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Characteristics of P-Band Tomographic Radar Backscatter of a Boreal Forest

Abstract: Temporal variations in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscatter over forests are of concern for any SAR mission with the goal of estimating forest parameters from SAR data. In this article, a densely sampled, two-year long time series of P-band (420 to 450 MHz) boreal forest backscatter, acquired by a tower-based radar, is analyzed. The experiment setup provides time series data at multiple polarizations. Tomographic capabilities allow the separation of backscatter at different heights within the forest. Tem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is opposite to the findings by Monteith and Ulander [58], who observed a decrease of backscatter intensity in the spring and summer months and an increase of backscatter values in autumn and winter. These behaviors could be explained by the different wavelengths, as Monteith and Ulander [58] used a longer wavelength P-band microwave sensor for their study, where more influence of the ground (soil moisture) and the tree trunks instead of the canopy should be more prominent. Additionally, more sparse boreal forests were studied compared to the temperate forests in this study.…”
Section: Sentinel-1 Backscatter Time Seriescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This behavior is opposite to the findings by Monteith and Ulander [58], who observed a decrease of backscatter intensity in the spring and summer months and an increase of backscatter values in autumn and winter. These behaviors could be explained by the different wavelengths, as Monteith and Ulander [58] used a longer wavelength P-band microwave sensor for their study, where more influence of the ground (soil moisture) and the tree trunks instead of the canopy should be more prominent. Additionally, more sparse boreal forests were studied compared to the temperate forests in this study.…”
Section: Sentinel-1 Backscatter Time Seriescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, while the Sentinel-1 acquisitions are either early in the morning or evening, the in situ evapotranspiration is based on the daily averages. Compared to the Sentinel-1 acquisition times, the other product acquisition times fall, therefore, within different domains of the diurnal cycle of biophysical activity, which might explain a decrease in the correlation for some data combinations compared to others [58,65,68]. A noticeable decrease in correlation for the ascending overpass direction can be observed at the AOI "Oberweissbach", where the correlation values are systematically lower compared to the other stations.…”
Section: Evapotranspiration Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Clear diurnal cycles were found in tower-based observations from forest stands (e.g. Hamadi et al, 2014;Monteith and Ulander, 2021) and agricultural cropland (e.g. Vermunt et al, 2020), as well as in aggregated satellite observations from larger forested areas (Paget et al, 2016;Emmerik et al, 2017;Konings et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…That is why some previous studies also revealed saturation problems, especially for high-frequency SAR data gathered in areas with high-level forest AGB [12]. The geometry partly determines the scattering direction, scattering distribution, and scattering strength of forest structure reflections [16]. Since forest backscatter is governed partly by forest structure geometry, including tree boles, branches, and leaves, relating SAR backscatter coefficients to biomass components, such as the biomass of tree stems, bark, branches, and needles or leaves, may improve the previously established thresholds of saturation problems [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%