“…The finding that at 5 years, a CAL gain of ≥4 mm was still measured in 75% (nine of 12) of the defects in both groups compared to baseline indicates that the short‐term results obtained with both treatments can be maintained for a longer period, despite the fact that the addition of PRP did not influence the outcomes obtained with EMD + NBM. Obviously, the regularly provided SPT (between 1 and 5 years, all 24 patients received SPT at least twice per year) substantially contributed to the long‐term stability of the results, corroborating previous findings 6,29‐32 . Moreover, the fact that the clinical improvements were equally maintained in both groups corroborates previous reports and suggests that patient compliance and regularly provided SPT are more important for ensuring long‐term stability than the regenerative approach itself.…”