2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icme51207.2021.9428106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensor-Based Multi-View Block-Diagonal Structure Diffusion for Clustering Incomplete Multi-View Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sparsity of W cannot be guaranteed even though W (v) is sparse in each view. Moreover, the sparsity of the result of Algorithm 2 is determined using (20). The parameter α is not known, and µ k always increases during the iterations of Algorithm 2.…”
Section: Sparsity Augmented Fusion Of Sparse Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sparsity of W cannot be guaranteed even though W (v) is sparse in each view. Moreover, the sparsity of the result of Algorithm 2 is determined using (20). The parameter α is not known, and µ k always increases during the iterations of Algorithm 2.…”
Section: Sparsity Augmented Fusion Of Sparse Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some IMVC methods have been proposed to alleviate the above problem. From the perspective of clustering techniques, existing IMVC methods are mainly divided into five categories, subspace learning-based methods [41], [43], nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF)-based methods [15], [16], graph learning-based methods [20], [39], multiple kernelbased methods [24], [23] and deep learning-based methods [38], [42], [21], [44], [46]. Wen et al present an extension of a low-rank representation (LRR) model that incorporates feature space-based missing-view inferring and manifold space-based similarity graph learning [41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It obtains the graph structure 𝑆 𝑣 for each view by (3), and the graph structures of different views will be integrated into the global graph A: However, it is difficult for k-means to achieve the desired classification. Equation (3) replaces the traditional optimization method when using the rank constraint of the Laplacian matrix in the optimization problem, and the performance is improved.…”
Section: Graph Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incomplete multi-view clustering algorithms are gradually applied to practical problems, making incomplete multi-view clustering one of the hottest research directions in this area. Traditional IMVC methods can be roughly divided into four categories, i.e., non-negative matrix factorizationbased methods [2,3,4], multi-view subspace clustering [5], kernel learning-based methods [6,7], and graph learning-based methods [8,9]. Among them, the method based on non-negative matrix factorization learns a low-dimensional consistent representation through all view information for clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) The learning of each view is separate and does not take inter-view similarity structure, which greatly reduces the advantages of multi-view data. Based on this observation, a series of tensor-based multi-view subspace representation methods have emerged to infer missing samples while clustering [8][9][10][11][12], which all consider tensor singular value decomposition (t-SVD) [13] to explore the high-order correlations among different views.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%