Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Computer Science Conference on Scaling Up : Meeting the Challenge of Complexity in Real-Worl 1994
DOI: 10.1145/197530.197559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminal assignment in a communications network using genetic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be seen in table 6, for large instances (10)(11)(12), the standard deviations and the average fitnesses for GAS and QBEA are smaller. It means that these algorithms are more robust to solve large instances than GA, TS, HGA, GAMO, LSGA, HDE, HSS, DDE, HPBIL, HACO and BA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As it can be seen in table 6, for large instances (10)(11)(12), the standard deviations and the average fitnesses for GAS and QBEA are smaller. It means that these algorithms are more robust to solve large instances than GA, TS, HGA, GAMO, LSGA, HDE, HSS, DDE, HPBIL, HACO and BA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Abuali et al [10] proposed a Greedy algorithm and a Hybrid Greedy-GA to solve TAP. Khuri and Chui [3] proposed a GA with a penalty function as alternative method to solve TAP and compared the results with the Greedy algorithm.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this kind of situations, our hybrid metaheuristics does not perform better than greedy algorithms, existing in the literature. In order to show the differences in performance 376 SALCEDO-SANZ, XU AND YAO we have implemented the greedy approach proposed in [1], adapting it to the FSCRP. This algorithm is, in pseudo-code, as follows:…”
Section: Further Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%