Proceedings Twelfth International Conference on VLSI Design. (Cat. No.PR00013) 1999
DOI: 10.1109/icvd.1999.745220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test generation for analog circuits using partial numerical simulation

Abstract: In this paper, we present a novel test generation strategy based on partial numerical fault simulation. Existing fault-based test generation methodologies for analog circuits are based on accurate but expensive fault simulation. In the proposed methodology, fault simulation is terminated before convergence for reasons of simulation speed. The relative fitness of various input stimuli is evaluated based on the results of this partial numerical simulation. A comparison of this new methodology with existing accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burdiek [11][12] used time domain sensitivity analysis to study the tested circuit; then, he used the difference between the normal working state and output response of each fault state as the optimization function to select the test excitation frequency, but the number of linear test vectors increased with the number of faults and the implementation was poor. Variyam et al [13][14] generated test excitations for linear analogue circuits through fast fault simulation algorithms based on state-space representation and adjugate matrix, but these were not relevant for nonlinear electric circuits. Han et al [15][16] used the improved classification speed as the optimization target, and classified the potentially faulty components by using the modified Mahalanobis distance according to the characteristic values of the measuring points.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burdiek [11][12] used time domain sensitivity analysis to study the tested circuit; then, he used the difference between the normal working state and output response of each fault state as the optimization function to select the test excitation frequency, but the number of linear test vectors increased with the number of faults and the implementation was poor. Variyam et al [13][14] generated test excitations for linear analogue circuits through fast fault simulation algorithms based on state-space representation and adjugate matrix, but these were not relevant for nonlinear electric circuits. Han et al [15][16] used the improved classification speed as the optimization target, and classified the potentially faulty components by using the modified Mahalanobis distance according to the characteristic values of the measuring points.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dc testing, a dc voltage or current is applied to the CUT and the dc response of the circuit is monitored to detect faults in the CUT [12]- [15]. Although dc tests can detect catastrophic faults effectively, they cannot detect parametric failures effectively.…”
Section: ) Static DC Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming there are test criteria on the alternate test measurements , they can be represented as in (15), where are certain specified bounds or (15) Each of the test criterion defines a region in the measurement space defined by (16).The region in the measurement space that satisfies all the test criteria is defined by (17) (16) (17) In [1] and [31]- [34], a hyperplane was derived for each of the single-ended specifications ( ) as the test criterion. Four such hyperplanes are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Multivariate Parametric Fault Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%