2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00462-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and Psychometric Validation of a Pediatric Instrument to Self-Assess Symptoms of the Common Cold

Abstract: Objectives Given the lack of validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments assessing cold symptoms, a new pediatric PRO instrument was developed to assess multiple cold symptoms: the Child Cold Symptom Questionnaire (CCSQ). The objective of this research was to evaluate the measurement properties of the CCSQ. Methods This observational study involved daily completion of the self-report CCSQ by children aged 6–11 years in their home for 7 days. These data were us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Floor effects were observed at Day 10, but this is consistent with the duration of URTI symptoms in published research, and thus provides support for the validity of the measure [ 13 ]. The decrease in symptom severity observed on the chest-related ePRO across the study period was also in line symptom trajectories illustrated in past research on The Canadian Acute Respiratory Illness and Flu Scale (CARIFS) [ 14 ] and CCSQ [ 5 ]. However, as neither the CARIFS nor CCSQ measure chest congestion specifically, the chest-related ePRO could be used to address this gap in conceptual coverage in instances where assessment of chest congestion symptoms is important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Floor effects were observed at Day 10, but this is consistent with the duration of URTI symptoms in published research, and thus provides support for the validity of the measure [ 13 ]. The decrease in symptom severity observed on the chest-related ePRO across the study period was also in line symptom trajectories illustrated in past research on The Canadian Acute Respiratory Illness and Flu Scale (CARIFS) [ 14 ] and CCSQ [ 5 ]. However, as neither the CARIFS nor CCSQ measure chest congestion specifically, the chest-related ePRO could be used to address this gap in conceptual coverage in instances where assessment of chest congestion symptoms is important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Eligible participants experiencing symptoms associated with an acute URTI, were then enrolled into the study by the recruiting clinician within 72 h of onset of cold symptoms. Participants were eligible if they responded at least ’some’ or ‘hard’ for one of the three chest congestion symptoms and at least ‘some’ for one of the other cold symptoms present on the Child Cold Symptoms Checklist for Chest Congestion (CCSC-CC) [ 5 ] at the time of the initial telephone screening and at Visit 1. The CCSC-CC was developed based on the CCSQ during the development of the CCSQ for the purpose of identifying/screening children with the common cold for inclusion in a research study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, valid and reliable PRO measures are arguably essential for evaluating severity in a condition defined by symptoms experienced by the patient such as chest congestion. The research described in this paper builds upon previous work conducted to develop and psychometrically validate a PRO measure—the Child Cold Symptom Questionnaire (CCSQ)—to assess the most important and burdensome cold symptoms in children aged 6–11 years [ 8 , 9 ]. During the development of the CCSQ it was recognised that chest congestion is a particularly difficult symptom to assess accurately in pediatric populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust, well-established methodologies exist for the development of PROs in adults as summarised by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [ 10 ]. These methods can be applied to pediatric work but with additional considerations not encountered in adults [ 8 , 9 , 11 – 13 ]. For example, wide variation exists in linguistic, cognitive, and motor capacities among children of the same age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the initial pilot study, 13 the assay sensitivity to distinguish treatment effects was improved by incorporating age‐appropriate assessment tools validated in children, specifically, the ambulatory cough monitor and subjective self‐reported assessments of cough 15–17 . Another key contributing factor was the selection of appropriate subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%