2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9173488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Procedure of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Trajectory in Automatic Missions

Abstract: This paper describes an experimental test campaign while using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and measuring the obtained UAV positions during different flight tasks and in different operative conditions. A new test procedure has been presented and tested for different devices in various weather conditions. This paper describes and analyses the measurements of the flight trajectory of the UAV that was performed with the use of a robotic total station (RTS), as compared to the design data and the data recorded… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional assessment of the accuracy of direct georeferencing could be based on the assessment of the positional accuracy of camera positions in addition to the accuracy on CP (e.g., tracking the UAVs trajectory by traditional topographic techniques and a prism mounted on the platform, as proposed in [73]. The platform tracking would also allow the actual flight path to be checked with respect to the designed flight plan, which could be a critical issue in areas with obstacles and occlusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional assessment of the accuracy of direct georeferencing could be based on the assessment of the positional accuracy of camera positions in addition to the accuracy on CP (e.g., tracking the UAVs trajectory by traditional topographic techniques and a prism mounted on the platform, as proposed in [73]. The platform tracking would also allow the actual flight path to be checked with respect to the designed flight plan, which could be a critical issue in areas with obstacles and occlusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the proposed method in this paper is not unique in terms of supporting UAVs, as any automated or even manned solutions can utilize the results, the strengths of the method are highlighted in the areas where an autonomous vehicle provides significant advantages over manned solutions (e.g., in aerial surveillance and monitoring). Furthermore, there has been much on-going research into real-world applications of UAVs in surveillance and monitoring operations [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these analyses are based on performing the full analysis pipeline and comparing the results to a known ground truth. In (Saponaro et al, 2019), (Roberts et al, 2017) and (Cwiakala, 2019) the authors test reconstruction performance on real images from UAS missions, while in (Hoppe et al, 2012), (Peng and Isler, 2019) and (Koch et al, 2019) simulated images are used. In all these cases, a 3D reconstruction with SfM is computed and certain points are compared to their kown true position.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%