1979
DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(79)90034-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the dogit model with aggregate time-series and cross-sectional travel data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kitamura and Lam (1984) and Swait and Ben-Akiva (1986) show that the incorrect representation of constraints in such captivity situations may lead to serious errors in the prediction of choice behavior. The dogit model has been used with some success in travel-mode choice analysis (Gaudry and Wills 1979;Swait and Ben-Akiva 1987b), but appears not to be well suited for destination choice modeling, where the operation of any constraints is much more complex than simple captivity to some alternative (Swait and Ben-Akiva 1987a;Thill 1992).…”
Section: Destination Choice Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kitamura and Lam (1984) and Swait and Ben-Akiva (1986) show that the incorrect representation of constraints in such captivity situations may lead to serious errors in the prediction of choice behavior. The dogit model has been used with some success in travel-mode choice analysis (Gaudry and Wills 1979;Swait and Ben-Akiva 1987b), but appears not to be well suited for destination choice modeling, where the operation of any constraints is much more complex than simple captivity to some alternative (Swait and Ben-Akiva 1987a;Thill 1992).…”
Section: Destination Choice Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extra costs and efforts are judged by many researchers as unwarranted. The dogit model (Gaudry and Dagenais 1979), developed specifically to overcome the IIA property of the logit model, brought only marginal improvement over the latter in an intercity model choice application (Gaudry and Wills 1979). Thus, despite its IIA property, the logit formulation is a simple, economical, and practical technique.…”
Section: Logit Versus Probit and Dogit Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model that can account for this is the Dogit model (Gaudry & Dagenais, 1979). In spite of its apparent applicability in numerous situations, the Dogit model has seldom been applied in practice (for examples, see Gaudry & Wills, 1979;Gaudry, 1980;Tse, 1987;Bordley, 1990;Chandrasekharan, McCarthy & Wright, 1994;Kannan & Yim, 2001). The Dogit model contains additional parameters to the standard MNL model, which are often interpreted as 'captivity', 'loyalty', 'gravity' or 'preference' coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%