1980
DOI: 10.2307/3150534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Effectiveness of Alternative Foot-in-the-Door Manipulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we find that the shopping momentum is not sensitive to the relative magnitude of the two items. Third, the foot-in-the-door effect is generally moderated by the involvement and impact on self-image generated by the initial request (Hansen and Robinson 1980), but the results of studies 4 and 5 suggests that momentum can be triggered by relatively low involvement and small purchases. Finally, foot-in-the-door is a long-term effect, operating across weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, we find that the shopping momentum is not sensitive to the relative magnitude of the two items. Third, the foot-in-the-door effect is generally moderated by the involvement and impact on self-image generated by the initial request (Hansen and Robinson 1980), but the results of studies 4 and 5 suggests that momentum can be triggered by relatively low involvement and small purchases. Finally, foot-in-the-door is a long-term effect, operating across weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A simple random sample of 115 firms was selected from a roster of the wineries in Mendoza and San Juan. We undertook several measures to increase participation and response rates, including gaining the enthusiastic approval of the project by the relevant sectoral associations, inviting firm owners/directors by mail and telephone to participate in the survey (Buse, 1973;Hansen & Robinson, 1980), and replacing 15 firms that declined to participate with 15 similar, randomly selected firms. One hundred and twelve firms completed surveys, giving a 97 percent response rate.…”
Section: Deductive Analysis: Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, McCabe and Michelson [ 27 ] test how effective this technique is in turning people out to vote and find that simply asking people if they could be counted on to vote is much more effective. Additional evidence suggests that follow-ups and reminders of one’s prior behavior can significantly increase the likelihood of subsequent action [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: The Psychological Bases Of Voting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%