2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46254-7_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text Type Differentiation Based on the Structural Properties of Language Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note however, that this comes at the cost of the high computation complexity of the procedures for calculating the properties. The GOW model in its diverse variants has been applied to many natural language processing tasks, including text summarization (Antiqueira et al, 2009), keyword extraction (Beliga et al, 2015(Beliga et al, , 2016, text genre detection (Grabska-Gradzińska et al, 2012;Martinčić-Ipšić et al, 2016b) and document classification (Blanco & Lioma, 2012;Hassan et al, 2007;Malliaros & Skianis, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2016;Papadakis et al, 2016;Rossi et al, 2012;Rousseau et al, 2015).…”
Section: Network Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note however, that this comes at the cost of the high computation complexity of the procedures for calculating the properties. The GOW model in its diverse variants has been applied to many natural language processing tasks, including text summarization (Antiqueira et al, 2009), keyword extraction (Beliga et al, 2015(Beliga et al, , 2016, text genre detection (Grabska-Gradzińska et al, 2012;Martinčić-Ipšić et al, 2016b) and document classification (Blanco & Lioma, 2012;Hassan et al, 2007;Malliaros & Skianis, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2016;Papadakis et al, 2016;Rossi et al, 2012;Rousseau et al, 2015).…”
Section: Network Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of multi-layer sentence networks (distinguishing links between sentences from the same document and those connecting sentences from different documents) has facilitated NLP undertakings such as multi-document summarization [ 22 ]. Moreover, increasing interest has been devoted to the rather microscopic features of linguistic networks, which are examined with measures including those concerning node centrality [ 22 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to using five known methods, namely the weighted common neighbors (CN), the weighted Jaccard coefficient (JC), the weighted preferential attachment (PA), the weighted Adamic-Adar (AA) and the weighted resource allocation index (RA) [156,157,199], we also propose selectivity (SE) [11] and inverse selectivity (IS) as two effective weighted similarity measures. Selectivity is defined as the average weight distributed on the links incident to the single node, and has proven efficient for different language network tasks, ranging from the differentiation between original and shuffled text [21] to the differentiation of text genres [200] and for keyword extraction [201,202]. We also note that link prediction on Twitter has been studied before in [203], where CN, AA, JC and RA measures were combined with the information about corresponding communities as determined with a variant of the label propagation algorithm in unweighted and directed networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%