2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05625-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textbook Outcomes in Liver Transplantation

Abstract: Background Textbook outcome (TO) is an emerging concept within multiple surgical domains, which represents a novel effort to define a standardized, composite quality benchmark based on multiple postoperative endpoints that represent the ideal ''textbook'' hospitalization. We sought to define TO for liver transplantation (LT) using a cohort from a high procedural volume center. Methods Patients who underwent LT at our institution between 2014 and 2017 were eligible for the study. The definition of TO was determ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our definition of TO was defined based on clinician consensus at a single institution. While this procedure is consistent with that reported in the literature, 18,19 we recognize that this approach inherently introduces bias in the selection of variables included in the definition. To limit this bias, future efforts to define TO in LTx may elect a data-driven approach to identify variables to prospectively optimize the definition among LTx programs nationally.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, our definition of TO was defined based on clinician consensus at a single institution. While this procedure is consistent with that reported in the literature, 18,19 we recognize that this approach inherently introduces bias in the selection of variables included in the definition. To limit this bias, future efforts to define TO in LTx may elect a data-driven approach to identify variables to prospectively optimize the definition among LTx programs nationally.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…TO is a novel multidimensional quality measure that may better differentiate performance and quality among US LTx centers than current TO was achieved by 52.1% of LTx recipients nationally, considerably higher than published rates of TO in institutional cohorts of kidney and liver transplant recipients (44.0% and 31.0%, respectively). 17,18 While some discordance in rates of TO achievement between singlecenter and national studies is expected, we observed a roughly twofold increase in our institution's rate of TO achievement when applying the current definition based on national data compared to our definition of TO using institutional data. 19 This stark difference in rates of TO achievement highlights the inherent differences in these TO measures, and likely reflects the variation in available LTx perioperative endpoints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to a review of existing "Textbook Outcome" metrics in the literature [19][20][21][22][23] , the de nition of surgical failure was subsequently expanded for totally robotic SADI-S-speci c outcomes selected based on clinician consensus among a team of bariatric surgeons at our institution. The nal de nition of surgical failure in totally robotic SADI-S included the following 5 key parameters: operative time > 210 min, length of postoperative stay > 7 days, postoperative morbid event ≥ Clavien grade II, conversion to laparotomy, and rehospitalization or death after totally robotic SADI-S. Surgical failure was recorded when any of the aforementioned parameters were observed.…”
Section: De Nitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the definition of textbook outcome varies, it frequently includes the evaluation of morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and hospital readmission. Moris et al [15] defined textbook outcome as a metric of an ideal outcome in liver transplantation. The textbook outcome for liver transplantation is based on the exclusion of the following parameters: mortality within 90 days, primary allograft nonfunction, early allograft dysfunction, rejection of the graft within 30 days, readmission with 30 days, readmission to the intensive care unit during hospitalization, hospital length of stay >75th percentile of all liver transplantation, red blood cell transfusion requirement >75th percentile for all liver transplantation complications (reintervention), and major intraoperative complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%