This article investigates populist rhetoric in the 2019 South African elections. I argue that both Julius Malema and Dr. Pieter Groenewald consistently employed populist appeals. Although populism is mostly confined to smaller opposition parties, I demonstrate that all major leaders utilised populist rhetoric to some degree. I briefly investigate the consequences of the EFF's populism, and contend that their campaign rhetoric has largely been mirrored in their behaviour between elections, challenging South Africa's democracy. Lastly, both populists made explicitly racialised appeals, albeit to different constituencies, contravening the country's political norm of nonracialism, seen as underpinning its political stability.