2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-014-0773-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 10 million follower fallacy: audience size does not prove domain-influence on Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that both the standard Argumentum Ad Populum and the Group-Ad Populum fallacies, despite their wide use, do not cause any improvement with respect to the neutral condition, thus confirming previous results on the inefficacy of recommendations based on the mere "appeal to the majority" [14,15], but in contrast to other relevant literature [16][17][18][19]). Finally, we found that negative framing, combined with visual accent, is effective in improving the number of clicks on recommended news, consistently with our expectations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results show that both the standard Argumentum Ad Populum and the Group-Ad Populum fallacies, despite their wide use, do not cause any improvement with respect to the neutral condition, thus confirming previous results on the inefficacy of recommendations based on the mere "appeal to the majority" [14,15], but in contrast to other relevant literature [16][17][18][19]). Finally, we found that negative framing, combined with visual accent, is effective in improving the number of clicks on recommended news, consistently with our expectations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results are neglecting the majority of tweets and can mislead a topic-based user influence, as 4 out of 5 of her tweets are not considered for measuring her influence. Cataldi and Aufaure (2015) and Bingol et al (2016) estimated user influence for topics based on PageRank. For that purpose they build a topic information exchange graph to take the information diffusion and degree of information shared into account for user influence estimation.…”
Section: Topic-based Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montangero and Furini (2015) compared their method to the number of followers of the users of interest. Cataldi and Aufaure (2015) used opinions from experts to evaluate their proposed influence measure. Lastly, Katsimpras et al (2015) used PageRank scores for as their evaluation measure.…”
Section: User Influence Measurement On the Identified Topics From Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are neglecting the majority of tweets and can mislead a topic-based user influence, as 4 out of 5 of her tweets are not considered for measuring her influence. Cataldi and Aufaure (2014) estimated Twitter user influence for topics of conversations based on PageRank. For that purpose they build a topic information exchange graph to take the information diffusion and degree of information shared into account for user influence estimation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%