The Behavioral Sciences and Management: An Evaluation of Relevant Journals

Extejt, Marian M.; Smith, Jonathan E.

doi:10.1177/014920639001600302

Cited by 112 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…53 Also, numerous attempts have been made to rank core subject journals. 54,55 In addition, in some fields, departments have produced internal ranking lists, as an aid to help faculty target their output. 56,57 Articles are also being written specifically about publishing and the RAE.…”

Section: Q Is There a Hierarchical List Which Attributesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise

Bence

Oppenheim

2004

Learned Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I ntroductionUp to and including 2001, five Research Assessment Exercises (RAEs) have taken place, and the RAE now forms a regular event in the UK academic calendar. The RAEs have had a profound effect on the funding of university research, and the relationship between quality and quantitative indicators of research performance has been a constant source of debate. This article focuses on how and where academic journal publications 'fit' within the RAE process itself by looking at three distinctive areas:

show abstract

Section: Q Is There a Hierarchical List Which Attributesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise

Bence

Oppenheim

2004

Learned Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When researchers are asked to engage in a journal evaluation task, their publication record is thus likely to be highly salient. Hence, it follows that when evaluating the quality of journals, respondents should be motivated to enhance their professional reputation by enhancing the quality of the journals that they have published in, precisely as observed by Extejt and Smith (1990).…”

Section: Identity Concerns In Judgments Of Journal Qualitymentioning

confidence: 97%

Experts’ Judgments of Management Journal Quality

Peters

Daniels

Hodgkinson

et al. 2012

Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Copyright and reuse:The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available.Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher's statement:This is the accepted version of the following article: Peters, K., Daniels, K., Hodgkinson, Gerard P., 1961-and Haslam, S. A.. (2012 Experts' judgments of management journal quality : an identity concerns model. Journal of Management Studies . ISSN 0022-2380 , which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311434532 . A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP url' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. ABSTRACTMany lists that purport to gauge the quality of journals in management and organization studies (MOS) are based on the judgments of experts in the field. This paper develops an Identity Concerns Model (ICM) that suggests that such judgments are likely to be shaped by the personal and social identities of evaluators. The model was tested in a study in which 168 editorial board members rated 44 MOS journals. In line with the ICM, respondents rated journal quality more highly to the extent that a given journal reflected their personal concerns (associated with having published more papers in that journal) and the concerns of a relevant ingroup (associated with membership of the journal's editorial board, or a particular disciplinary or geographical background). However, judges' ratings of journals in which they had published were more favorable when those journals had a low quality reputation and their ratings of journals that reflected their geographical and disciplinary affiliation were more favorable when those journals had a high quality reputation. Our findings are thus consistent with the view that identity concerns come to the fore in journal ratings when there is either a need to protect against personal identity threat or a meaningful opportunity to promote social identity. (204 words)Keywords: Journal quality, journal lists, social identity, self-favoring bias Lewis, 2008). This suggests that in spite of the debate over whether the journal can be regarded as a meaningful unit of analysis (Starbuck, 2005) there is a degree of consensus in MOS th...

show abstract

“…Criteria used to select articles and organize the review We examine empirical research that assessed any of the five cultural values published in top-tier management and applied psychology journals (Extejt and Smith, 1990;Gomez-Mejia and Balkin, 1992;Johnson and Podsakoff, 1994;Tahai and Meyer, 1999) and in journals specializing in international management and psychology (see Table 1). We excluded areas such as marketing or finance because of the traditional delineation of these fields (in business schools and most academic journals) and the need to place limits on our comprehensiveness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since Geert Hofstede's Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, 1980) was published, researchers have utilized Hofstede's cultural values framework in a wide variety of empirical studies. We review 180 studies published in 40 business and psychology journals and two international annual volumes between 1980 and June 2002 to consolidate what is empirically verifiable about Hofstede's cultural values framework. We discuss limitations in the Hofstede-inspired research and make recommendations for researchers who use Hofstede's framework in the future. Journal of International Business Studies (2006) 37, 285–320. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202

show abstract

The Behavioral Sciences and Management: An Evaluation of Relevant Journals

Cited by 112 publications

References 13 publications

The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise

The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise

Experts’ Judgments of Management Journal Quality

A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About