2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The benefits of social buffering are maintained regardless of the stress level of the subject rat and enhanced by more conspecifics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the individual reduction in average SCRs to aversive sounds in the social treatment groups should augment with increasing trait and state anxiety scores. By contrast, the results of a recent animal study [31] predict no relationship between the social modulation effect and individual differences in trait and state anxiety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the individual reduction in average SCRs to aversive sounds in the social treatment groups should augment with increasing trait and state anxiety scores. By contrast, the results of a recent animal study [31] predict no relationship between the social modulation effect and individual differences in trait and state anxiety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…were found to correlate with a stronger reduction of neural and behavioral anxiety responses in participants with high trait anxiety [20,21]. However, in contrast to these findings in humans, a recent study on rodents has shown similar social modulation effects in rats that were conditioned to a low, medium and highly stressful stimulus, indicating that the intensity of social modulation of stress was independent of the stress status of the animals [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Social species can acquire information about their environment through conspecific interactions. The transmission and buffering of stress responses between conspecifics are broadly observed and highly conserved phenomena (Gunnar et al, 2015;de Waal and Preston, 2017;Debiec and Olsson, 2017;Oliveira and Faustino, 2017;Kiyokawa et al, 2018;Monfils and Agee, 2019). Stress can trigger enduring changes in the ability of synapses to exhibit synaptic plasticity, resulting in metaplasticity (Kim and Diamond, 2002;Huang et al, 2005;Schmidt et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, social buffering is more robust between familiar rats [ 20 ] and animals of the same strain [ 39 ]. Although sex differences in social buffering have not been thoroughly explored [ 3 , 40 ], it is possible that females are more effective than males at buffering fear in familiar conspecifics which might influence the reciprocal social behaviors and decision-making to give way to more social exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%