The Brazilian Military Under Cardoso: Overcoming the Identity Crisis

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Center for Latin American Studies at the University ofMiami is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 169.229.32.137 on Thu, 8 May 2014 21:02:35 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions After Pinochet: Civilian Policies Toward the Military in the 1990s Chilean Democracy Comparing the Aylwin and Frei administrations, this article probes the question of why civilian authorities did not always use the legal and political tools they had acquired to respond to the military's institutional and political demands. Actors' preferences, leadership style, and strategic decisions influence the way civilian leaders use those tools. Civilian responses have important and sometimes unintended consequences for the stabilization of the civil-military relationship in new democratic regimes. The Brazilian Military Under Cardoso: Overcoming the Identity Crisis In Brazil, an era of military confusion and dissatisfaction that followed the end of the Cold War has largely dissipated since the mid-1990s. Despite scarce federal resources under current economic policies, the Cardoso government has managed to eliminate the most immediate budgetary causes of military unrest. Military authoritarian influence remains, moreover, in areas such as Amazonia. The military's own efforts, the president's moral and economic support, and the legislature's traditional apathy toward relevant issues have fostered a new form of military influence in the Brazilian democracy. After Pinochet: Civilian Policies Toward the Military in the 1990s Chilean Democracy Comparing the Aylwin and Frei administrations, this article probes the question of why civilian authorities did not always use the legal and political tools they had acquired to respond to the military's institutional and political demands. Actors' preferences, leadership style, and strategic decisions influence the way civilian leaders use those tools. Civilian responses have important and sometimes unintended consequences for the stabilization of the civil-military relationship in new democratic regimes. The Brazilian Military Under Cardoso: Overcoming the Identity Crisis In Brazil, an era of military confusion and dissatisfaction that followed the end of the Cold War has largely dissipated since the mid-1990s. Despite scarce federal resources under current economic policies, the Cardoso government has managed to eliminate the most immediate budgetary causes of military unrest. Military authoritarian influence remains, moreover, in areas such as Amazonia. The military's own efforts, the president's moral and economic support, and th...

Les relations civilo-militaires dans les Amériques et la diffusion de normes régionales: quel rôle pour l'OEA?

“…Quoi qu'il en soit, il faut se questionner à savoir si cette nouvelle loi et ces objectifs réussiront dans l'avenir à modifier le comportement politique des forces armées brésiliennes. Ces dernières sont reconnues comme étant un groupe de pression légitime dont l'influence va de la formulation des politiques au sein de l'exécutif jusque dans les chambres législatives ou judiciaires 96 .…”

La Amazonía en el pensamiento militar brasileño: concepciones y acciones estratégicas del Ejército y la Armada en la década de 1990

“…En términos teóricos, el trabajo parte de los supuestos del institucionalismo discursivo, indirectamente utilizado por autores como Jensen (2016), Marques (2007) y Martins Filho y Zirker (2000). Este enfoque supone que los cambios estratégicos y doctrinales se originan en las comunidades epistémicas y en los espacios discursivos (Schmidt 2008;Jensen 2016).…”