2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The C-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II Is a Multivalent Targeting Sequence that Supports Drosophila Development with Only Consensus Heptads

Abstract: Highlights d Consensus heptads are sufficient to support Drosophila development d Too many consensus heptads are deleterious d The wild-type Drosophila CTD alone localizes to sites of active transcription d CTDs with too many consensus heptads tend to localize to extrachromosomal foci

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we have proposed that RNA Polymerase II's (RNAPII) affinity for common co-factors or even itself could facilitate enhancer-promoter interactions 18,19 . This model is supported by reports that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNAPII specifies active promoter localization through its affinity for other CTDs 20 , as well as the low-complexity domain of Cyclin T1 21 . If correct, these models suggest that transcription may be required for distal enhancer function, challenging the commonplace methodology of using DNase hypersensitive sites (DHSs) and histone marks to identify enhancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly, we have proposed that RNA Polymerase II's (RNAPII) affinity for common co-factors or even itself could facilitate enhancer-promoter interactions 18,19 . This model is supported by reports that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNAPII specifies active promoter localization through its affinity for other CTDs 20 , as well as the low-complexity domain of Cyclin T1 21 . If correct, these models suggest that transcription may be required for distal enhancer function, challenging the commonplace methodology of using DNase hypersensitive sites (DHSs) and histone marks to identify enhancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In the future, it will be important to validate these descriptive assessments, for example by determining whether the puncta are sensitive to treatment with hexanediol, a chemical used to disrupt phase-separated condensates, and to see whether they contain important transcriptional regulatory components, such as RNA Pol II or CDK9. This would complement other studies that have shown how the carboxy terminal heptapeptide repeats in RNA Pol II mediate phase separation and are important for transcription elongation (Boehning et al, 2018;Lu et al, 2019;Lu et al, 2018). Furthermore, future work will be required to test whether the molecular mechanisms underlying Yki/YAP/TAZ phase separation, identified primarily using purified proteins and in vitro cell culture systems, are relevant in vivo.…”
Section: Phase Separation Of Yap and Tazmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Improvement in gene synthesis and targeting has nevertheless allowed the precise replacement at the endogenous rpb1 locus of the authentic CTD by variants preserving its natural length in yeast ( 15 , 42 ) and more recently in Drosophila ( 43 ), opening the way for genetic dissection of the requirement of CTD phosphorylation in vivo during growth and development. Unexpectedly, these experiments revealed that budding yeast or fission yeast CTD S2A are fully viable, a phenotype contrasting the lethality resulting from the deletion of most genes coding for 3′-end processors, including Pcf11, proposed to be recruited by the S2P mark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%