2018
DOI: 10.12717/dr.2018.22.2.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The C-terminal Phosphorylation Sites of eel Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor are Important Role in the Signal Transduction

Abstract: The large extracellular domain of glycoprotein hormone receptors is a unique feature within the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) family. After interaction with the hormone, the receptor becomes coupled to Gs, which, in turn stimulates adenylyl cyclase and the production of cAMP. Potential phosphorylation sites exist in the C-terminal region of GPCRs. The experiments described herein represent attempts to determine the functions of the eel follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (eelFSHR). We constructed a mut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximal response of eelFSHR-t614 was also drastically lower than that of eelFSHR-wt (Kim et al, 2018). We also reported that the constitutively activated eelFSHR-D540G mutant displayed remarkably increased response (13.1 to 19.6-fold) when compared to the wild type receptor (Kim et al, 2019), suggesting that cAMP production was greatly increased in the absence of eelFSH stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximal response of eelFSHR-t614 was also drastically lower than that of eelFSHR-wt (Kim et al, 2018). We also reported that the constitutively activated eelFSHR-D540G mutant displayed remarkably increased response (13.1 to 19.6-fold) when compared to the wild type receptor (Kim et al, 2019), suggesting that cAMP production was greatly increased in the absence of eelFSH stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…PathHunter CHO-K1 Parental cells are engineered to stably express the enzyme acceptor-tagged β-arrestin fusion protein. These cells were transiently transfected according to the supplier's protocol as previously described (Lee et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2018). Transfections were performed using the liposome transfection method as previously described (Byambaragchaa et al, 2018).…”
Section: Transient Transfection Of Pathhunter Cho-k1 Parental Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cDNAs encoding wild-type and mutant eel LHR were digested with the Eco RI and Xho I restriction enzymes. The resulting fragments were then ligated into the pcDNA3.1 and pCORON1000 SP VSV-G expression vectors, as previously described (Byambaragchaa et al, 2018(Byambaragchaa et al, , 2021a. Finally, we constructed a total of five receptor genes, including WT eel LHR, mutant eel LHR-L469R, LHR-D590Y, LHR-D417N, and LHR-Y558F.…”
Section: Site-directed Mutagenesis Of Eel Luteinizing Hormone Receptor (Lhr) Mutants and Vector Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPCR signal transduction including glycoprotein hormone receptors, has been studied in detail with respect to the loss of cell surface receptors, internalization, and recycling (Bhaskaran & Ascoli, 2005;Jacobsen et al, 2017;Foster & Bauner-Osborne, 2018). Recent research studies on eel glycoprotein hormones and receptors from our laboratory have elucidated the signal transduction of the eel LHR (Byambaragchaa et al, 2018a,b) and eel follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR; Kim et al, 2016Kim et al, , 2018Kim et al, , 2019 on deglycosylated ligands. We also first reported in fish species that the eel FSHR-D540G mutant exhibited a high increase in the basal cAMP response (Byambaragchaa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, eCG is a distinct molecule for biological activity and the structure of its glycoresidues. We previously reported several studies on eCG, including cDNA cloning of the eCG α-subunit and β-subunit, biological dual activities of LH-like and FSH-like in cells expressing rat LHR and rat FSHR (rLHR and rFSHR), and ovulation rate in vivo (Min et al, 1994(Min et al, , 1996(Min et al, , 2004, 2020Park et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2018;Byambaragchaa et al, 2021a,b,c;Lee et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%