1999
DOI: 10.7547/87507315-89-9-472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The calcaneal angle in Nigerians. Relationship to sex, age, and side of the body

Abstract: The authors studied the calcaneal angle in Nigerians and found it to range from 28 degrees to 38 degrees with a mean of 32.83 degrees (SD 2.84 degrees). The calcaneal angle in Nigerians is not significantly related to sex, age, or side of the body (left or right). Proper alignment of the calcaneus is essential for the maintenance of the arches of the foot, for standing erect, and for walking and running. Thus the calcaneal angle must be borne in mind whenever reconstructive surgery is performed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
15
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
15
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of variation in calcaneal angle have never been reported to exceed 15 0 , while the lowest and highest reported BA has been 25 0 and40 0 respectively, this is similar to finding among population of close similarity. 5,8. There was no significant difference in BA between this study and the study among Nigerian at p>0.05, however the relationship between the age and BA was reported for the first time 9 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The range of variation in calcaneal angle have never been reported to exceed 15 0 , while the lowest and highest reported BA has been 25 0 and40 0 respectively, this is similar to finding among population of close similarity. 5,8. There was no significant difference in BA between this study and the study among Nigerian at p>0.05, however the relationship between the age and BA was reported for the first time 9 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The highest frequency occurred in the 35-39°r ange for males and the 30 -34°range for females. Table 1 also compares similar data in Nigerians previously studied (Didia and Dimkpa, 1999). Table 2 shows the comparisons of the calcaneal angle in Ugandans and Nigerians.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…There were also significant differences between Ugandan and Nigerian men (P Ͻ 0.01) and Ugandan and Nigerian women (P Ͻ 0.001). Didia and Dimkpa (1999). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations