2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0110-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The capital investment channel of environmental improvement: evidence from BRICS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that investment is not a significant determinant of environmental quality in Nigeria when we consider carbon emissions, but it has a substantial effect in lowering particulate emissions damage in the country. This result is at variance with Mesagan et al (2018), who confirmed that capital investment is an essential channel for improving environmental quality in BRICS. Also, the coefficient of urbanization suggests that it positively but insignificantly affects environmental degradation and CO 2 emissions, whereas it positively and significantly increases PM emissions in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This means that investment is not a significant determinant of environmental quality in Nigeria when we consider carbon emissions, but it has a substantial effect in lowering particulate emissions damage in the country. This result is at variance with Mesagan et al (2018), who confirmed that capital investment is an essential channel for improving environmental quality in BRICS. Also, the coefficient of urbanization suggests that it positively but insignificantly affects environmental degradation and CO 2 emissions, whereas it positively and significantly increases PM emissions in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We include energy consumption as it is an essential determinant of environmental pollution in a location. Empirical studies such as Soytas et al (2007) and Mesagan et al (2018) opined that energy consumption has severe implications for environmental quality because it is crucial in the production process. Again, when trade openness increases in a country, it enables the country to gain access to improved technology for pollution abatement; the country also gains access to international capital markets for the inflow of investment, which has environmental implications too (Copeland and Taylor, 1994).…”
Section: Theoretical Justification For the Inclusion Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the foregoing, it is clear that the literature is active regarding the role of financial development in the energy–growth–environment nexus but most of the studies rather focus on fossil energy rather than renewable energy whose propensity to influence environmental quality is high and has become a global consensus (see Al‐Mulali et al, 2015; Apergis & Ozturk, 2015; Kahia, Aissa, & Lanouar, 2017; Katircioglu & Katircioglu, 2018; Mesagan, Isola, & Ajide, 2018). Also, most of the studies that incorporate financial development in the energy–growth–environment nexus proxy it with either one of the two traditional measures of financial depth—ratio of money supply to GDP or ratio of private credit to GDP—or, at best, compute an index from other financial indicators using principal component analysis (see Al‐Mulali et al, 2015; Javid & Sharif, 2016; Ozatac, Gokmenoglu, & Taspinar, 2017; Shahbaz, Mahalik, Shah, & Sato, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%