1990
DOI: 10.1109/17.62322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The causes of project failure

Abstract: A study was conducted of 97 projects identified as failures by the projects' managers or parent organizations. Using the project implementation profile [20], a set of managerially controllable factors were identified as associated with project failure. The factors differed according to three contingency variables: 1) the precise way in which failure was defined; 2) the type of project; and 3) the stage of the project in its life cycle. Implications for project management and for future research on failed proje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
310
0
21

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
310
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Project success and failure were first introduced by Rubin and Seeling [13], with Shenhar et al [14], Pinto and Mantel [11] reiterating that project success was contingent upon the specific project characteristics. Shultz, Slevin and Pinto [15] were among the first to classify the critical factors.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Project success and failure were first introduced by Rubin and Seeling [13], with Shenhar et al [14], Pinto and Mantel [11] reiterating that project success was contingent upon the specific project characteristics. Shultz, Slevin and Pinto [15] were among the first to classify the critical factors.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers investigated the issue in the reverse manner, by studying the causes of project failure. Using this approach, Pinto and Mantel [11] identified three aspects of project performance as benchmarks for measuring the success or failure of a project: the implementation process, the perceived value of the project, and client satisfaction with the result.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As measuring criteria, the fulfillment of a fixed goal, the compliance with budget progress, or achieving an acceptable level of performance were used in past studies. Pinto and Mantel identified three aspects of project performance as benchmarks for measuring the success or failure of a project: the implementation process, the perceived value of the project, and client satisfaction with the final product [20]. Freeman and Beale identified seven main criteria to measure projects success: technical performance, efficiency of execution, managerial and organizational implications (mainly customer satisfaction), personal growth and a manufacturer's ability, business performance, project termination, and technical innovativeness [21].…”
Section: Measurement Of Product Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O comitê de alto nível é responsável por garantir os recursos necessários e a autoridade para suprir os projetos em andamento. Ao se relacionar o apoio da alta administração com: o acompanhamento adequado, a demonstração de compromisso com a gestão de projetos, a criação de um ambiente para projetos de sucesso, o encontro da associação positiva entre o suporte da alta administração e o sucesso do projeto, a percepção de gaps entre o que a alta administração deveria fazer e o que realmente faz, observa-se uma perspectiva dicotômica entre a retórica e a realidade (PINTO; PRESCOTT, 1988;MANTEL JR, 1990;IRELAND, 2002).…”
Section: Contexto E Relevância Da Pesquisaunclassified