2005
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2005.tb00660.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chaos Theory of Careers: A User's Guide

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to set out the key elements of the Chaos Theory of Careers. The complexity of influences on career development presents a significant challenge to traditional predictive models ofcareer counseling. Chaos theory can provide a more appropriate description of career behavior, and the theory can be applied with clients in counseling. The authors devote particular attention to the application of attractor concepts to careers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
59
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Theories variously focus on matching -finding the right sized workers for the right sized jobs (for example Holland, 1997), life stages, highlight the developmental nature of career paths and the range of different drivers which may influence individuals at different ages (for example Super, 1990), sociological or economic factors (Roberts, 1997), identity (Ibarra, 2005), chance events (Bright and Pryor, 2005) and making meaning (Savickas, 2012). Amundson et al (2010) in an empirical study, identified three key factors which individuals identified when describing their own career choices: the economic reality, the people in one's life and the meanings that people are looking for within their work.…”
Section: Study 3: Adviser Advise Thyself: How Career Practitioners Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theories variously focus on matching -finding the right sized workers for the right sized jobs (for example Holland, 1997), life stages, highlight the developmental nature of career paths and the range of different drivers which may influence individuals at different ages (for example Super, 1990), sociological or economic factors (Roberts, 1997), identity (Ibarra, 2005), chance events (Bright and Pryor, 2005) and making meaning (Savickas, 2012). Amundson et al (2010) in an empirical study, identified three key factors which individuals identified when describing their own career choices: the economic reality, the people in one's life and the meanings that people are looking for within their work.…”
Section: Study 3: Adviser Advise Thyself: How Career Practitioners Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, HLT develops career adaptability primarily by encouraging action that leads to new knowledge and the learning of new skills, which in turn can prepare a client for the serendipitous events that often occur following proactive career behaviors. Similar to HLT, the chaos theory of careers (CTC; Bright & Pryor, ) also emphasizes the role of chance events in career development. In fact, much of the research supporting the importance of chance events on career decision making and career development is from studies researching CTC (e.g., Hirschi, ).…”
Section: Hltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hall, 1996b, p. 8) Proteus, the shape-shifting Greek god, is the fitting icon for the worker best suited to handle the challenges and opportunities of a VUCA environment. The traditional psychometric approaches used to match student traits and attitudes to major and career selection will prove increasingly useless because stability will define neither the future workplace nor the worker (Arthur & Rousseau, 1996;Bright & Pryor, 2005;Hall & Moss, 1998;Sullivan, 1999;van Vianen, De Pater, & Preenen, 2009). While in the past academic psychologists typically believed that personality traits were set after childhood and adolescence, like plaster that had dried (Dweck, 2008;Roberts & Mroczek, 2008), contemporary schools of thought, such as positive psychology, suggest that individuals can continue to consciously grow and develop in adaptive ways (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000;Seligman, Rashid, & Parks, 2006).…”
Section: Personal Traits and Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%