2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1808228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characteristics of hole trapping in HfO2∕SiO2 gate dielectrics with TiN gate electrode

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inTunneling of holes observed at work function measurements of metal / HfO 2 / SiO 2 / n-Si gate stacks Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 122102 (2010); 10.1063/1.3360879 Direct tunneling stress-induced leakage current in ultrathin Hf O 2 ∕ Si O 2 gate dielectric stacks Degradation mechanism of HfAlO X ∕ SiO 2 stacked gate dielectrics studied by transient and steady-state leakage current analysis J. Appl. Phys. 97, 074505 (2005); 10.1063/1.1884253 Effects of denuded zone of Si ( 111 ) surfac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the device being in strong accumulation during erase operation, this threshold voltage shift being opposed to the ferroelectric influence can only be explained by hole injection from the substrate or electron detrapping that extends into the bulk of the Si : HfO 2 film with increasing time and voltage. Similar observation for TiN/HfO 2 /SiO 2 /p-Si gate stacks has already been made by Lu et al who claimed hole injection from the substrate to be the dominant reason for threshold voltage instabilities at negative voltage stress [11].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For the device being in strong accumulation during erase operation, this threshold voltage shift being opposed to the ferroelectric influence can only be explained by hole injection from the substrate or electron detrapping that extends into the bulk of the Si : HfO 2 film with increasing time and voltage. Similar observation for TiN/HfO 2 /SiO 2 /p-Si gate stacks has already been made by Lu et al who claimed hole injection from the substrate to be the dominant reason for threshold voltage instabilities at negative voltage stress [11].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Mechanism of charge carrier generation.-The origin of positive oxide charge in a hafnium-based gate stack remains controversial between trapping of holes 11,12,26,27 and protons. [3][4][5] The above …”
Section: H662mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the resultant ⌬V th was negative and its magnitude decreased with decreasing stress voltage when ͉V g ͉ Ͼ 2.5 V. This result has been well known coming from the hole trapping in the gate stack. 16 However, the tendency was not monotonic when we kept going on lowering the stress voltage. As ͉V g ͉ Ͻ 2.5 V, we clearly observed that the sign of a͒ ⌬V th changed, indicating that the type of the net trapped charge in the dielectrics has changed from hole to electron and the degradation became much worse with further deceasing stress voltage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They can also get trapped because there are usually plentiful hole traps existing inside the high-dielectrics. 16 Therefore, the resultant ⌬V th was negative. On the contrary, the hole injection is significantly suppressed by the presence of the interfacial layer as the stress voltage becomes smaller and then the effect of trapped electron will gradually prevail over that of trapped hole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%