The characteristics of Portuguese management academics and their fit with teaching accreditation standards

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the debate on the quality and accreditation of management education by examining the fit between the characteristics of current management academics in Portugal and recognised accreditation standards. For purposes of comparison, the authors use both general Portuguese teaching accreditation standards and specific international standards for management education. Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse indicators of staff career positioning, tenure status, full time vs part-time, age, degree qualifications, field of training, level of academic inbreeding, internationalisation, research activity, professional activity, and the number of hours taught per week. The authors also examine the relationship between them, in light of accreditation standards, for all academic staff teaching in management degrees submitted for compulsory accreditation by the Portuguese accreditation agency. Findings – The reality found in this study shows gaps between the actual attributes of management academics and what can be considered appropriate attributes, according to the general consensus found in the literature and which is duly mirrored in common “qualified faculties” accreditation standards by Portuguese and international standards (AACSB, AMBA and EQUIS). Research limitations/implications – The findings relate to the Portuguese situation and the analysis developed should be extended to other contexts. Also, while the data, which were collected through a census, has a wide national scope, it only covers one academic year. Practical implications – This work has policy setting implications for degree accreditation and for developing capacity during the transitional periods when universities implement the mandatory minimum standards. It can also help universities to benchmark themselves against their peers as a diagnostic tool for elaborating improvement plans. Social implications – The massification of higher education has led to legitimate concerns about the quality of the services provided, and consequently accreditation procedures were devised to restore trust. However, policy makers must be aware of the impacts of their actions, namely the effects of degree accreditation, as their goals need to be achieved with the minimum negative impact on academic work. Originality/value – The authors work sheds light on the characteristics of those who teach management and how they align with the current accreditation policies that affect academia globally and, in the process, presents empirical evidence from Portugal, which is at a relatively early stage in the accreditation process.

Quality through accreditation

“…This is a challenge for business schools as well as for all higher education institutions. In consequence, the requirements regarding faculty can often be difficult for business schools to fulfil (Sarrico and Pinheiro, 2015).…”

Too many PhDs? An invalid argument for countries developing their scientific and academic systems: The case of Portugal

“…The second and third issues relate to the qualifications and age distribution of academic staff at Portuguese universities and the stock of doctorate holders. These two issues have attracted increased interest in the literature since they are believed to have an impact on the quality of research, teaching, and other services that universities provide to society (see Sarrico and Alves, 2015;Sarrico and Pinheiro, 2015). The fourth issue concerns the specific contribution of the stock and flows of doctorates to research output, relative to mature scientific systems (Pinheiro et al, 2014).…”

O desempenho da investigação em gestão em Portugal: Algumas causas e consequências

“…1960 -1969 1970 -1979 1980 -1989 1990 -1999 2000 -2009 No que respeita à investigação, apenas uma percentagem reduzida (cerca de 13%) produziu investigação relevante (com 5 referências) o que, aliado ao facto de cerca de 36% dos docentes não terem ainda o grau de doutor, poderá levantar algumas apreensões quanto à componente de atualização e aprofundamento científico daqueles (Sarrico & Pinheiro, 2015).…”