The Co-option of Audience Data and User-Generated Content: Empowerment and Exploitation Amidst Algorithms, Produsage and Crowdsourcing

Stehling, Miriam; Vesnić-Alujević, Lucia; Jorge, Ana; Marôpo, Lídia

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75638-7_5

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sin embargo, en la mayoría de los casos, se verán frustradas por no llegar a alcanzar las metas que ellos esperaban inicialmente. Es por ello, se convierte en una necesidad tender puentes entre las tensiones que emergen de esta cooptación de las audiencias, siendo imprescindible la redefinición de leyes, normas y roles entre industrias culturales y culturas participativas (Stehling et al, 2018). A continuación, desglosamos las tres áreas principales que hemos detectado en este estudio como ámbitos aspiracionales de pseudo-profesionalización de los adolescentes españoles: los videojuegos, la escritura digital y redes sociales.…”

Section: Cooptación De Audiencias: Oportunidades Y Riesgosunclassified

Jugadores, escritores e influencers en redes sociales: procesos de profesionalización entre adolescentes

Establés

Guerrero-Pico

Espinosa

2019

RLCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción. La evolución de la industria mediática ha precipitado profundos cambios en la forma en que los adolescentes desarrollan sus competencias y acceden a la producción transmedia. En concreto, nos centraremos en la aparición de una zona gris donde los hobbys mediáticos devienen en oportunidades de profesionalización para los jóvenes, y en oportunidades de beneficio económico para las industrias. Metodología. El enfoque metodológico que se ha llevado a cabo se ha realizado desde una perspectiva mixta de métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos. Se han integrado técnicas de recolección y análisis de datos de corte etnográfico, estadístico y textual. Resultados. Se detectan tres ámbitos de profesionalización: videojuegos, escritura creativa y redes sociales con sus propias dinámicas con respecto al género de los adolescentes y los recursos y plataformas utilizados. Discusión y Conclusiones. Los adolescentes que emprenden procesos de profesionalización son una minoría y, dentro de este grupo, es fundamental fortalecer las competencias que les permitan comprender en qué medida su trabajo beneficia económicamente a las compañías de comunicación.

show abstract

Section: Cooptación De Audiencias: Oportunidades Y Riesgosunclassified

Jugadores, escritores e influencers en redes sociales: procesos de profesionalización entre adolescentes

Establés

Guerrero-Pico

Espinosa

2019

RLCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in most cases, they will be frustrated by their failure to reach their initial goals. For this reason, it is necessary to build bridges between the tensions that emerge from this cooption of the audience, which requires the redefinition of laws, norms and roles between cultural industries and participative cultures (Stehling et al, 2018).…”

Section: Co-option Of the Audience: Opportunities And Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gamers, writers and social media influencers: professionalisation processes among teenagers

Establés¹,

Guerrero-Pico²,

Contreras-Espinosa³

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The evolution of the media industry has prompted profound changes in the way teenagers develop their skills and access transmedia products. To be precise, the article focuses on the emergence of a grey area where media hobbies become professionalisation opportunities for young people, and profit opportunities for the industries. Methods. The study has been carried out from a mixed qualitative and quantitative methods approach. Ethnographic, statistical and textual data collection and analysis techniques have been implemented. Results. Three areas of professionalisation are detected: video games, creative writing and social networks, each with its own dynamics with respect to teenagers' gender and the resources and platforms used. Discussion and conclusions. Teenagers who undertake professionalisation processes constitute a minority and, within this group, it is essential to strengthen the skills that allow them to understand to what extent media companies profit from their work.

show abstract

“…They are therefore important actors in the digital media environment's broader logics and economies of datafication (Helmond 2015). They are a key site of user data commodification (Steheling et al 2018), and also of user creativity and resistance with respect to data cultures (David & Cambre 2016;Wang 2018;Zhao 2018). However, as yet we know remarkably little about the corporate structures behind these apps, how economic value is attributed to and extracted from dating app data, and how these data are monetized.…”

Section: Jean Burgess (Qut) Kath Albury (Swinburne) and Rowan Wilken (mentioning

confidence: 99%

Data Selves: Trust, Control and Self-Representation in Digital Society

Robards¹,

Lyall²,

Moran³

et al. 2019

SPIR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A considerable amount of personal data is now collected on and by individuals: footsteps on Fitbits, screen time in Apple’s iOS, conversations on dating apps, sleeping patterns in baby tracker apps, and viewing habits on Netflix and YouTube. What value do these data have, for individuals but also for corporations, governments, and researchers? When these data are provided back to users, how do people make sense of it? What ‘truth claims’ do quantified personal data make? How do we navigate anxieties around datafied selves, and in what ways are bodies rendered visible or invisible through processes of datafication in digital society? In this panel we explore these questions through four papers centered on the notion of the “data-selfie.” Data-selfies take different forms, including but not limited to:- Visuals that reference the “status” or “progress” of a user’s physical body, as in 3-D scans, or charts generated by self-monitoring apps for health and fitness.- Visuals that reference the remapping of photographic self-expression to biometric, corporate and state surveillance, such as airport facial recognition check points that ask flyers to pose for a selfie, or sex offender databases that now contain images first posted to hook up apps by consenting teenagers.- Representations of the embodied or commoditized self, produced not as stand-alone expression, but as conversational prompts that encourage qualitative, “story-driven” data, in the interests of pedagogy, therapy, activism, etc.- Profiles that reference users as “targets” whose chief value is the metadata they generate. Using proprietary algorithms, platforms mine this metadata—which can include information about a users’ device, physical location, and their activities online—categorizing it for internal use, and selling it to third parties interested in influencing the consumer, social and/or political preferences of the “targets” in question. In Paper 1, Authors 1, 2, and 3 develop a new conceptualisation for understanding how individuals reveal themselves through their own quantified personal data. They call this the ‘confessional data selfie’. Drawing on a sample of 59 examples from the top posts in subreddit r/DataIsBeautiful, they argue that the confessional data selfie represents an aspect of one’s self, through visualisations of personal data, inviting analysis, eliciting responses and personal story-telling, and opening one’s life up to others. In Paper 2, Authors 4, 5, and 6 take a political economy of communication approach to analyse the data markets of dating apps. They consider three cases: Grindr, Match Group (parent company of Tinder), and Bumble. Drawing on trade press reportage, financial reports, and other materials associated with the apps and publishers in question, they point to the increased global concentration in ownership of dating app services and raise questions about the ways in which dating apps are now in the ‘data business’, using personal data to profile users and monetise private interactions. In Paper 3, Author 7 reports on experiences of ‘data anxiety’ among older people in Australia. Author 7 draws on data literacy workshops, home-based interviews and focus groups with older internet users, that led to discussions of control over personal data, control over social interactions, and the resulting implications for exposure, openness, and visibility. Also key to this study was the taking and sharing of selfies in a closed Facebook group, serving as the starting point for reflections on these various experiences of control. Many of these older participants questioned whether or not ongoing participation in social media and broader data structures were ‘worthwhile’. This raises broader questions about the extent to which users are willing to sacrifice control over personal data - or the feeling of control - in order to participate and be visible. Finally, in Paper 4, Author 8 asks: when is the face data? Moving from examples of ‘deepfake’ video exhibitions to Google Art as a repository of ‘face-data’ as cultural and social capital, Author 8 goes on to examine how notions of face-as-data apply to individuals living with the neurological condition of autism. Can facial recognition apps help people with autism to read and decode human expressions? Taken together, these four papers each engage with questions about the relationship between personal data and broader structures of power and representation: from corporations like Grindr and Tinder using dating app data to profile users, to Google using uploaded selfies to train facial recognition algorithms; through to re-purposing and narrativising personal data as part of practices of self-representation; and the feelings of anxiety, unease or creepiness that accompany the increased datafication of personal identity. Self-representation is also a key recurrent thread in these papers, from confessional data selfies as acts of revelation through personal quantified data, through to the photographic selfie as a research exercise that prompts discussions of control and data privacy.

show abstract

The Co-option of Audience Data and User-Generated Content: Empowerment and Exploitation Amidst Algorithms, Produsage and Crowdsourcing

Cited by 11 publications

References 38 publications

Jugadores, escritores e influencers en redes sociales: procesos de profesionalización entre adolescentes

Jugadores, escritores e influencers en redes sociales: procesos de profesionalización entre adolescentes

Gamers, writers and social media influencers: professionalisation processes among teenagers

Data Selves: Trust, Control and Self-Representation in Digital Society

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About