2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00580-005-0565-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative evaluation of uterine and cervical mucosa cytology with endometrial histopathology in cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also Zargham‐Khan et al. (1998) and Ahmadi et al. (2005) claimed that cytogenic examination is a reliable method for establishing the presence or absence of uterine inflammation in a buffalo cow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Zargham‐Khan et al. (1998) and Ahmadi et al. (2005) claimed that cytogenic examination is a reliable method for establishing the presence or absence of uterine inflammation in a buffalo cow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endometrial receptivity is compromised by the presence of pathogenic bacteria and bacterial products such as gram-negative bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) or pro-inflammatory mediators (PGF2α or Nitric Oxide, NO), compromising early embryo development (Soto et al, 2003, Schwarz et al, 2008, Gilbert, 2011. After contact with endotoxin LPS, endometrial immune receptors (toll-like receptors, TLR), recognize the pathogen and trigger the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL1β, IL6) and chemokines (IL8) which in turn attract and activate neutrophils and macrophages to the site of inflammation (Ahmadi et al, 2005, Galvao et al, 2011, Gilbert, 2011. Hill and Gilbert (2008) demonstrated that embryos exposed to pro-inflammatory cytokines in the culture media had a reduced number of trophectoderm cells thereby impairing their ability to produce IFNτ required for successful MRP.…”
Section: Embryo Mortality and Endometrial Receptivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After transrectal palpation and ultrasonographic examination of the uterus, a sample was collected from the cervix uteri using a sterile cotton swab (1,38). The vulva of each cow was cleaned and a speculum was inserted through the vagina.…”
Section: Cytological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an Table 3 Changes in contrast values during the study period. Different letters (a, b, c, d) in the columns and different numbers (1,2,3,4) 84.70 ± 4.49 2,3 90.41 ± 4.26 a, 2,3 79.44 ± 3.49 1,3,4 73.59 ± 1. increase until d 2 after treatment (p < 0.05) a decrease was re corded in the following examination period. In group E3 the MGL reached higher values at 6 h after treatment (p < 0.05) which also exceeded those in group C at this examination timepoint (p < 0.05) (▶ Table 5).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Echotexture Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%