2005
DOI: 10.1108/13673270510602818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept of knowledge work revisited

Abstract: PurposeTo identify and critically assess the most recurrent themes in the ongoing debate on knowledge work.Design/methodology/approachA representative selection of studies published since 1962 is reviewed. The review focuses on the theoretical strengths and limitations of the concept of knowledge work.FindingsThe review indicates that definitions of knowledge work abound. Although knowledge work has attracted scholarly minds for several decades and the number of publications in this area has rapidly increased … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
92
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Balkyte and Tvaronavičiene (2010) and Pyöriä (2005) have emphasized the abilities of knowledge workers to act as an interface between new technology and human interactions. Glaeser (2000) and Raspe and Van Oort (2008) confirm the importance of knowledge work and knowledge worker as the engines of regional economic growth.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balkyte and Tvaronavičiene (2010) and Pyöriä (2005) have emphasized the abilities of knowledge workers to act as an interface between new technology and human interactions. Glaeser (2000) and Raspe and Van Oort (2008) confirm the importance of knowledge work and knowledge worker as the engines of regional economic growth.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por conseguinte, esta perspectiva diz respeito ao trabalhador do conhecimento, uma vez que se dedica ao incremento do capital intelectual. Estes trabalhadores distinguem-se por terem no conhecimento seu principal instrumento de trabalho, estão acostumados a atividades não rotineiras, e são capazes de criar novas soluções ou adicionar valor às já existentes (Davenport, 2005;Florida, 2002Florida, , 2005Pyöriä, 2005). Engenheiros, físicos, matemáticos, profissionais da computação, arquitetos, cientistas, advogados são alguns dos exemplos desta classe.…”
Section: Perspectiva Socioculturalunclassified
“…The temporal relation between the subtasks is modeled using plans. The Concur Task Trees (CTT) [19] approach is also based on hierarchical task decomposition. It further allows task classification in different categories (abstract tasks, user tasks, interaction tasks, and application tasks) which directly hint towards a further need of task decomposition or towards the responsible stakeholder for task execution.…”
Section: Task Execution Process Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the knowledge work description of [21] as a semiotic activity of information creation, transformation, and consumption. Knowledge work often is executed using computer desktop applications, which deliver a restricted set of functionalities [19]. For this understanding of knowledge work, Hädrich identifies a set of eight reoccurring knowledge work actions as fragments of work [9].…”
Section: Ontologies For Unstructured Task Execution Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation