2005
DOI: 10.1075/term.11.2.07rey
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concept of neologism and the evolution of terminologies in individual languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Neologism has been studied in linguistics [4–6], mostly by paying close attention to the process of new word formation. As a neologism is of marginal interest even for the linguistic community, it is no surprise that it has not been studied from the perspective of dynamic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neologism has been studied in linguistics [4–6], mostly by paying close attention to the process of new word formation. As a neologism is of marginal interest even for the linguistic community, it is no surprise that it has not been studied from the perspective of dynamic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Minova-Gjurkova, 2003;Janusheva & Jurukovska, 2015;Janusheva, 2020;Janusheva & Stojanoska 2021). In addition, the new words are subject of interest of many domestic and foreign researchers (Gerasim, 1990;Rey, 1995;Niska, 1998;Minova-Gjurkova, 2003;Simoska, 2007;Spasojevikj, 2011;Arnold, 2012;Konoplekina, 2013;Zhakhanova & Luchkova 2013;Janusheva, 2015;Janusheva, 2020;Janusheva, 2021;Kovalenko, 2021). Their explanations of what words should be treated as 'new words' differ slightly as well.…”
Section: Broader Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreting language is subjective and inexact. Language can be flexible and meaning is typically attributed to words on the basis of how people use them (Rey, 2005;Temmerman and Van Campenhoudt, 2011). However, sometimes this process results in omnibus terms which have too many meanings to be useful (Peters, 1991;Lindenmayer and Fischer, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%