2013
DOI: 10.1177/0748175613481981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consequences of Perfectionism Scale

Abstract: This study investigated the Consequences of Perfectionism Scale (COPS) and its relationships with perfectionism, performance perfectionism, affect, and depressive symptoms in 202 university students using confirmatory factor analysis, correlations, and regression analyses. Results suggest that the COPS is a reliable and valid measure of positive and negative consequences of perfectionism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six studies were identified as having assessed the psychometric properties for the APS-R Flett, Mara, Hewitt, Sirois, & Molnar, 2016;Grzegorek, Slaney, Franze, & Rice, 2004;Rice, Ashby, & Slaney, 2007;Rice, Richardson, & Tueller, 2014;Slaney et al, 2001); one study for the BDQ (Lee, Roberts-Collins, Coughtrey, Phillips, & Shafran, 2011); two studies for the COPS (Kim, 2010;Stoeber, Hoyle, & Last, 2013); eleven studies for the FMPS (Anshel & Seipel, 2006;Burgess, Frost, & DiBartolo, 2016;Frost et al, 1990;Harvey, Pallant, & Harvey, 2004;Khawaja & Armstrong, 2005;Parker & Adkins, 1995;Purdon, Antony, & Swinson, 1999;Rice & Dellwo, 2001;Rice, Ashby, & Slaney, 1998;Stallman & Hurst, 2011;Stoeber, 1998); three studies for the HMPS Hewitt, Flett, Turnbull-Donovan, & Mikail, 1991;Trumpeter, Watson, & O'Leary, 2006); three studies for the PANPS (Egan, Piek, Dyck, & Kane, 2011;Haase & Prapavessis, 2004;Terry-Short, Owens, Slade, & Dewey, 1995); two studies for the PI (Cruce, Pashak, Handal, Munz, & Gfeller, 2012;Hill et al, 2004); one study for the PSPS ; two studies for the APS-R and FMPS (Kim, Chen, MacCann, Karlov, & Kleitman, 2015;Pearson & Gleaves, 2006); five studies for the FMPS and HMPS (Bieling, Israeli, & Antony, 2004;Cox, Enns, & Clara, 2002;Flett, Hewitt, Endler, & Tassone, 1995;Frost, Heimberg, Holt, Mattia, & Neubauer, 1993;…”
Section: Results Of the Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies were identified as having assessed the psychometric properties for the APS-R Flett, Mara, Hewitt, Sirois, & Molnar, 2016;Grzegorek, Slaney, Franze, & Rice, 2004;Rice, Ashby, & Slaney, 2007;Rice, Richardson, & Tueller, 2014;Slaney et al, 2001); one study for the BDQ (Lee, Roberts-Collins, Coughtrey, Phillips, & Shafran, 2011); two studies for the COPS (Kim, 2010;Stoeber, Hoyle, & Last, 2013); eleven studies for the FMPS (Anshel & Seipel, 2006;Burgess, Frost, & DiBartolo, 2016;Frost et al, 1990;Harvey, Pallant, & Harvey, 2004;Khawaja & Armstrong, 2005;Parker & Adkins, 1995;Purdon, Antony, & Swinson, 1999;Rice & Dellwo, 2001;Rice, Ashby, & Slaney, 1998;Stallman & Hurst, 2011;Stoeber, 1998); three studies for the HMPS Hewitt, Flett, Turnbull-Donovan, & Mikail, 1991;Trumpeter, Watson, & O'Leary, 2006); three studies for the PANPS (Egan, Piek, Dyck, & Kane, 2011;Haase & Prapavessis, 2004;Terry-Short, Owens, Slade, & Dewey, 1995); two studies for the PI (Cruce, Pashak, Handal, Munz, & Gfeller, 2012;Hill et al, 2004); one study for the PSPS ; two studies for the APS-R and FMPS (Kim, Chen, MacCann, Karlov, & Kleitman, 2015;Pearson & Gleaves, 2006); five studies for the FMPS and HMPS (Bieling, Israeli, & Antony, 2004;Cox, Enns, & Clara, 2002;Flett, Hewitt, Endler, & Tassone, 1995;Frost, Heimberg, Holt, Mattia, & Neubauer, 1993;…”
Section: Results Of the Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was taken into account that there are perfectionists who work hard with the desire to do things above their real performance over time (Antony -Swinson, 2009), who have achieved great success, who do not see productivity and success as the criterion of their own value that they set for themselves, and who can experience emotional satisfaction regardless of the result. Although the categorization of perfectionism as normal and neurotic, positive and negative, adaptive and maladaptive, harmless and harmful, functional and dysfunctional, clinical and non-clinical began with Hamachek's article titled "Psychodynamics of Normal and Neurotic Perfectionism" published in 1978 (Hamachek, 1978), its systematic conceptualization with its sub-dimensions dates back to the early 1990s, when multidimensional perfectionism scales were developed (For the scales, see Frost vd., 1990;Hewitt -Flett, 1991;Terry-Short vd., 1995;Johnson -Slaney, 1996;Hill vd., 2004;Kim, 2010;Stoeber vd., 2013;Smith vd., 2016).…”
Section: Introduction 1 Perfectionism and Pietymentioning
confidence: 99%