2016
DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2015.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Controversial Star-Formation History and Helium Enrichment of the Milky Way Bulge

Abstract: The stellar population of the Milky Way bulge is thoroughly studied, with a plethora of measurements from virtually the full suite of instruments available to astronomers. It is thus perhaps surprising that alongside well-established results lies some substantial uncertainty in its star-formation history. Cosmological models predict the bulge to host the Galaxy's oldest stars for [Fe/H] −1, and this is demonstrated by RR Lyrae stars and globular cluster observations. There is consensus that bulge stars with [F… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An assessment of the uncertainties connected with stellar evolutionary models is more difficult. Even the models of single stars differ significantly among different authors because of different input physics (Verbunt & Phinney 1995;Nataf et al 2012). In particular, the timescales of the consecutive evolutionary phases and radii of the models may differ by several percent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment of the uncertainties connected with stellar evolutionary models is more difficult. Even the models of single stars differ significantly among different authors because of different input physics (Verbunt & Phinney 1995;Nataf et al 2012). In particular, the timescales of the consecutive evolutionary phases and radii of the models may differ by several percent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then convert these errors to distance offsets using m = + ( ) d log 1 5, where d is in parsecs and we assume μ=14.6. Lastly, we interpolate the errors and offsets of the Milky Way relations relative to the LMC, where the track with age 10 Gyr, 0.27 helium, and [Fe/H]=−0.1 is used to approximate the Milky Way Bulge (Nataf 2016;Bensby et al 2017). The results of Choudhury et al (2016) and Bensby et al (2017) indicate that the Bulge is at least ∼0.30 dex more metal-rich, on average, than the LMC, and the difference may be as much as 0.40 dex once the alpha-enhancements are taken into account.…”
Section: Effects Of Age and Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a stellar population quite different from that of the local disk. In particular, the vast majority of Galactic bulge (excluding the nucleus) stars are > ∼ 8 Gyr old [42] whereas the Galactic disk environment has experienced star formation up to the present day. This difference may well mean that the stellar progenitors of the putative GCE region MSPs are systematically older than the progenitors of local MSPs (and, indeed, that the MSP population is systematically older and dimmer given that MSPs spin down and become less luminous over time).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%