2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021sw002983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Correspondence Between Sudden Commencements and Geomagnetically Induced Currents: Insights From New Zealand

Abstract: Rapid changes in the Earth's surface magnetic field generate anomalous currents in a large-scale grounded infrastructure; these are known as Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GICs). Examples of infrastructure vulnerable to GICs include pipelines, power networks, and railways. In such systems, GICs can cause increased weathering of components or in extreme cases even direct damage (e.g.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that high latitude magnetic field spikes which can cause GICs are not confined solely to geomagnetic storm conditions. At mid and low latitudes, sudden commencements are found to be a major factor in producing spikes (e.g., Smith et al, 2019;Smith et al, 2021Smith et al, , 2022), but we do not find a significant population of high latitude spikes near noon. More comparisons of the driving mechanisms of spikes at high and mid-to-low latitudes are required.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that high latitude magnetic field spikes which can cause GICs are not confined solely to geomagnetic storm conditions. At mid and low latitudes, sudden commencements are found to be a major factor in producing spikes (e.g., Smith et al, 2019;Smith et al, 2021Smith et al, , 2022), but we do not find a significant population of high latitude spikes near noon. More comparisons of the driving mechanisms of spikes at high and mid-to-low latitudes are required.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In the main, we focus on spikes with dB/ dt > 300 nT min −1 , as spikes of this magnitude were responsible for power grid blackouts during the 2003 Halloween storm (Kappenman, 2005). The focus on large dB/dt means that our results apply to high latitudes only: more modest values of dB/dt occur at mid and low latitudes (e.g., Rogers et al, 2020;Smith et al, 2019Smith et al, , 2021Smith et al, , 2022 but will not be included in our analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining more than 15 years of GIC observations made at a single power grid transformer near Christchurch in New Zealand, Smith et al. (2022) showed that SCs that occurred while New Zealand was on the dayside of the planet were related to GICs that were 30% larger than if New Zealand were on the night‐side for the same magnetic field rate of change. This could not be accounted for by controlling for the dominant orientation of the largest rate of change of the field, and was inferred to be partly due to the different frequency content of the SC signature at different local times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we expand on the work of Smith et al. (2022), assessing how GIC observed at 75 different power grid transformers in the New Zealand power network are impacted by SCs. We determine whether the type of SC is important, if the previous day/night asymmetry is common across the network, and how the dominant orientation of the SC signature impacts distinct part of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathie and Mann, 2000;Murphy et al, 2011) and event based studies of Ultra-low Frequency waves (e.g., Rae et al, 2019) which can be used in radiation belt modeling (e.g., Mann et al, 2016;Ozeke et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2018); studies of the spatial distribution and expansion of waves (e.g. Milling et al, 2008;Murphy et al, 2009), field aligned currents (e.g., Pulkkinen et al, 2003;Weygand et al, 2011), the substorm current wedge (e.g., Lester et al, 1983;Cramoysan et al, 1995), and geomagnetically induced currents (e.g., Pulkinen et al, 2005;Pulkinen et al, 2017;Smith et al, 2022); analysis of field line resonances (e.g., Mann et al, 2002;Rae et al, 2005); remote sensing of in-situ plasma properties (e.g., e.g., Mann et al, 2002;Rae et al, 2005); and magnetoseismology of ionospheric disturbances (e.g., Waters et al, 1996;Chi and Russell, 2005;Chi et al, 2013;Kale et al, 2009). For more examples see Mann et al (2008), Russell et al (2008), Menk and Waters (2013), Engebretson and Zesta (2017), and Murphy et al (2022a)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%