1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-6505(98)00070-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cosmic ray energy spectrum between 1014 and 1016 eV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These are important basic parameters to describe an air shower, although they are not very sensitive to the primary composition. In order to study the composition around the knee, measurements of muon content in each air shower [10] or muons in deep underground [11,12], measurements of lateral distribution of air shower Cherenkov lights [13], or maximum depth of shower development using air Cherenkov telescopes [14], and multiparameter measurements of air showers [15] have been carried out and devoted to making the conclusion about the knee composition. In spite of great efforts so far, however, there is a divergence of conclusions on the composition from experiment to experiment and the knee composition is still the question at issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are important basic parameters to describe an air shower, although they are not very sensitive to the primary composition. In order to study the composition around the knee, measurements of muon content in each air shower [10] or muons in deep underground [11,12], measurements of lateral distribution of air shower Cherenkov lights [13], or maximum depth of shower development using air Cherenkov telescopes [14], and multiparameter measurements of air showers [15] have been carried out and devoted to making the conclusion about the knee composition. In spite of great efforts so far, however, there is a divergence of conclusions on the composition from experiment to experiment and the knee composition is still the question at issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement appears reasonable and deviations are mostly explained by uncertainties in the energy scale by up to 25 %, e.g. CASA MIA data [35] were shifted upwards in energy by 20 % to yield a better agreement to the other data sets. This is likely to be explained by the interaction model SIBYLL 1.6 [36] employed by the authors of Ref.…”
Section: Multi-component Methods and Non-parametric Approachesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…All particle spectrum. Points -data of direct and EAS experiments [18,[26][27][28][29][30][31]. Solid line -spectrum of used primary model, dotted line -spectrum of background cosmic ray flux.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%