1986
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1986.03380180014001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both components are populated by stars following a logarithmic MF in the range 0.1M ⊙ ≤ M l ≤ 1.2M ⊙ . These distributions produce an event duration distribution which is consistent with observed ML timescales (see BKR, Figure 3), though other evidence points towards a disk MF which exhibits some flattening below 1 M ⊙ (Scalo 1986;Larson 1986;Gould, Bahcall, & Flynn 1995).…”
Section: Expected Fractions Of Parallax-shifted Eventssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both components are populated by stars following a logarithmic MF in the range 0.1M ⊙ ≤ M l ≤ 1.2M ⊙ . These distributions produce an event duration distribution which is consistent with observed ML timescales (see BKR, Figure 3), though other evidence points towards a disk MF which exhibits some flattening below 1 M ⊙ (Scalo 1986;Larson 1986;Gould, Bahcall, & Flynn 1995).…”
Section: Expected Fractions Of Parallax-shifted Eventssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the above calculations we assumed a logarithmic MF down to 0.1 M ⊙ for disk lenses, which is consistent with current ML observations. However, other evidence points to a disk MF which turns over at masses near 0.4 M ⊙ (Scalo 1986;Larson 1986;Gould, Bahcall, & Flynn 1995). Thus, given the sensitivity of F P SE to disk lenses, we also consider the HST MF, log φ = 1.35 − 1.34 log(M/M ⊙ ) − 1.85 [log(M/M ⊙ )] 2 in the range from 0.1 M ⊙ ≤ M l ≤ 5.0 M ⊙ , as well as a composite power-law MF with dN/dM = 0 for 0.1 (Mihalas & Binney 1982).…”
Section: Expected Fractions Of Parallax-shifted Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the assumed bulge MF is also adopted for the disk, the resulting duration distribution is consistent with MACHO and OGLE observations in the sense of fitting the main peak (see ZRS Figure 2). However, the present-day MF of the disk is believed to follow a power-law behavior which flattens out around sub-solar masses (Scalo 1986, Larson 1986). Scalo (1986) finds a flattening in the MF below 1.0M ⊙ with a maximum near 0.3M ⊙ , while HST observations by Gould, Bahcall, & Flynn (1995) find a maximum near 0.5M ⊙ .…”
Section: Disk Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%