2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool: A Report of Validity and Reliability Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
439
3
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 549 publications
(496 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
439
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…182 Several instruments have been developed to detect selfreported deficits associated with CAI. [76][77][78]133 The FADI and its revised version, the FAAM; Ankle Instability Instrument; and CAIT are tools with published values for validity or reliability (or both). [76][77][78]133 The FADI and FAAM provide a scale for activities of daily living and sports, offering added sensitivity for the athletic population.…”
Section: Special Considerations: Caimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…182 Several instruments have been developed to detect selfreported deficits associated with CAI. [76][77][78]133 The FADI and its revised version, the FAAM; Ankle Instability Instrument; and CAIT are tools with published values for validity or reliability (or both). [76][77][78]133 The FADI and FAAM provide a scale for activities of daily living and sports, offering added sensitivity for the athletic population.…”
Section: Special Considerations: Caimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the subject's eligibility, a series of screening questions (box 1) were posed outlining further inclusion and exclusion criteria. Retrospectively questioning using the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) [14] was also performed to ascertain the severity of instability.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UG (n = 10) The groups were divided according to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) score, proposed by H et al 29 , which was adapted to the Brazilian population by N et al 30 . e questionnaire is composed by nine multiple-choice questions, with scores between zero to 30, whereas the higher the score the better the ankle condition.…”
Section: Sg (N = 10)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e threshold that separate individuals with higher risk to develop FAI was 27, and scores ≀ 24 indicates moderate FAI 29,[31][32] . For the present study, a score of 24 was adopted as a cut point, whereas individuals with values lower or equal to 24 were classi ed as unstable.…”
Section: Sg (N = 10)mentioning
confidence: 99%