2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016jb012955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The deep crust beneath the Trans‐European Suture Zone from a multiscale magnetic model

Abstract: We present a 3‐D interpretation of the deep magnetic sources beneath the main geological structure of central‐eastern Europe, the “Trans‐European Suture Zone” (TESZ). We used a multiscale analysis of aeromagnetic data, based on a multiscale data set generated by upward continuation of the European and Mediterranean Magnetic Project data set from 5 to 100 km altitude. We also computed the multiscale total gradient |∇T| of the multiscale field. Both of the multiscale data sets allow us to discriminate the main c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Multiridge [36] method is a multiscale technique of the potential field, based on the detection of the extrema of the considered field, and of its derivatives, also called edges. In particular, the ridges, defined as the lines passing through the edges related to different spatial scales, intersect at the source center, and so the method allows for investigating about the depth and the horizontal position of sources from the ridges analysis of the field [46]. The method is stable, performs a high-resolution analysis and allows the separation of interfering contributions, which are common in a multi-source case [43].…”
Section: Multiridge Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Multiridge [36] method is a multiscale technique of the potential field, based on the detection of the extrema of the considered field, and of its derivatives, also called edges. In particular, the ridges, defined as the lines passing through the edges related to different spatial scales, intersect at the source center, and so the method allows for investigating about the depth and the horizontal position of sources from the ridges analysis of the field [46]. The method is stable, performs a high-resolution analysis and allows the separation of interfering contributions, which are common in a multi-source case [43].…”
Section: Multiridge Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a strong difference between the EEC and Paleozoic platforms occurs clearly because of the intense |∇T | highs covering most of the EEC and the substantially non-magnetic behavior of the Paleozoic Platform characterized by a few sparse, weak and isolated anomalies. Huge |∇T | highs are located above the TESZ region, which, according to Milano et al (2016), suggests the TESZ as a magnetic structure involving the whole crust down to the deep lithosphere. This picture seems to favor hypothesis B as the main cause of the CEML.…”
Section: Magnetic Field At 100 Kmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9c, we performed the same type of joint analysis in the area of the Brabant Massif, Namur Basin and Ardennes Massif. Magnetic and paleomagnetic studies (e.g., Molina Garza and Zijderveld, 1996) have pointed out Paleozoic carbonate rocks in Belgium characterized by uniform reverse polarity as a consequence of regional remagnetization events that occurred during tectonic and orogenic activity at late Carboniferous times. In the magnetic field map, we observe two intense magnetic lows, with no clear presence of their relative highs, which transform to two highs in the |∇T | map.…”
Section: Magnetic Field At 100 Kmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the satellite data alone, the proposed reversepolarity of the TESZ magnetic anomaly is not totally resolved or explained. Recently, Milano et al (2016) performed a multiscale analysis on a three-dimensional aeromagnetic dataset in central Europe and produced a model of the deep magnetic sources; they found that the origin of the high-altitude magnetic field in central Europe was mainly due to changes of crustal thickness and of physical properties between western and eastern Europe. To resolve the situation we have both enhanced the spectral content of magnetic data and applied new analytical methods to the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%