2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11467-019-0913-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The delay time of gravitational wave — gamma-ray burst associations

Abstract: The first gravitational wave (GW) -gamma-ray burst (GRB) association, GW170817/GRB 170817A, had an offset in time, with the GRB trigger time delayed by ∼1.7 s with respect to the merger time of the GW signal. We generally discuss the astrophysical origin of the delay time, ∆t, of GW-GRB associations within the context of compact binary coalescence (CBC) -short GRB (sGRB) associations and GW burst -long GRB (lGRB) associations. In general, the delay time should include three terms, the time to launch a clean (r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of GRB170817 our work places strong constraints on the physical origin of the observed γ-ray signals, assuming that the statistical limit on t w found in this work applies also for this specific GRB. We find that the observed delay between the GW and the γ-ray signal is dominated by the time it takes the jet to reach the location at which it will radiate (see also Zhang 2019). The consequence of this interpretation is that the γ-ray duration may naturally (depending on the prompt emission model; see Section 4.6) be of the same order of the observed delay, which is the case for GRB170817.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the context of GRB170817 our work places strong constraints on the physical origin of the observed γ-ray signals, assuming that the statistical limit on t w found in this work applies also for this specific GRB. We find that the observed delay between the GW and the γ-ray signal is dominated by the time it takes the jet to reach the location at which it will radiate (see also Zhang 2019). The consequence of this interpretation is that the γ-ray duration may naturally (depending on the prompt emission model; see Section 4.6) be of the same order of the observed delay, which is the case for GRB170817.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The joint electromagnetic and gravitational-wave detection of GW170817-like events with the addition of a NEMO will enable significant further insight into gamma-ray burst physics. For example, the delay time between the collapse and the prompt emission will drive studies into the jet-launching mechanism (e.g., Zhang 2019;Beniamini et al 2020) that is currently ill-understood (Zhang 2018), and the existence and lifetime of the remnant will reveal the impact of neutrino radiation on heavy-element formation through the rapid neutroncapture process in kilonovae (Metzger & Fernández 2014;Martin et al 2015;Fernández et al 2019;Kawaguchi, Shibata, & Tanaka 2020).…”
Section: Other Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total intrinsic time delay is expected to be a few seconds (e.g., Zhang 2019), and potentially up to 10 s in extreme scenarios. Separately constraining the different contributions to the intrinsic time delay unveils great insight into these events (e.g., Li et al 2016;Abbott et al 2017b;Zhang 2019). The more precisely we can determine the intrinsic time delay the greater our constraints on fundamental physics.…”
Section: The Time Delay From Merger To Prompt Gamma-ray Burst Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimessenger observations of GWs and SGRBs provide new information to investigate the viable jet launching mechanisms. In the magnetar case you would expect a longer time delay from the GW-inferred merger time to the on-set of GRBs emission (Zhang 2019). Remnant classification (Sect.…”
Section: Ultrarelativistic Jet Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%