2021
DOI: 10.3926/jotse.1135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of equating application for computer based in physics HOTS category

Abstract: This study aims to develop a score equating application for computer-based school exams using parallel test kits that have 25% anchor items, the items are arranged according to the HOTS (High Order Thinking Skill) category and use a scientific approach according to the characteristics of physics lessons. So that the questions are made using stimulus, options, logical and systematic. The research method used is Research and Development (R&D), which begins with an analysis of the current needs of schools and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research used a development approach (Hamid, Lee, Taha, Rahim & Sharif, 2021;Supriyati, Iriyadi, & Falani, 2021). The development model refers to the 4D model.…”
Section: Acknowledgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research used a development approach (Hamid, Lee, Taha, Rahim & Sharif, 2021;Supriyati, Iriyadi, & Falani, 2021). The development model refers to the 4D model.…”
Section: Acknowledgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methods can be used in the graphical method: the characteristic curve method from Haebara and the characteristic curve method from Stocking & Lord. These widely used methods produce nearly identical equalization results (Supriyati et al, 2021). The mean-mean, mean-sigma, Haebara, and Stocking and Lord methods will be used in this study for test equalization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(DeBoer et al, 2014;Efendi et al 2021;Hosseini, Abidin & Baghdarnia, 2014;Lehane, 2019;Lehane, Scully. & O'Leary, 2022;Hurley, 2017;Nugroho, Kusumawati & Ambarwati, 2018;Supriyati, Iriyadi, & Falani, 2021;Shilova, Artamonova & Averina, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of identifiable threats to the use of CBTs they include; high cost relating to the startup and maintenance of computer environment hard ware, software, networking and wiring, inadequate school-based infrastructure, possible technological failure, not being suitable for every type of assessment (such as extended response) server and power related issues, limited CBT centers, technical issues (like in the use of the mouse, font size, screen clarity, screen size, screen resolution, display and scrolling rate) state of mind of students, students' computer literacy and accessibility, insufficient computers and internet access, test taker characteristics like their selfefficacy, interest, personality, intelligence motivation, familiarity with and accessibility to computer, availability of computer and IT expert during test and the likes ( Efendi et al 2021;Lehane, 2019;Lehane, Scully. & O'Leary,2022;Supriyati et al, 2021). Some of these factors may influence the academic achievement of students in these examination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%