The Development of Rural Peripheral Areas in Lithuania: The Challenges of Socio-Spatial Transition

Abstract

The collapse of the Soviet utopian world, where the government sought to plan and control economic and social processes, caused a wave of significant changes in the post-socialist countries. The territorial regrouping of citizens is one of the hard to control changes that started at the end of the 1990s in Lithuania. This article identifies the major changes in the settlement system in Lithuania and its effects on peripheral areas. The main scope of this article is an analysis of the potential of residents from peripheral areas to adapt to the rapidly changing socio-economic environment. For the analysis, we used data and information gathered during field trips to peripheral rural areas throughout the country between 2013 and 2014. This study found that the residents who remained in peripheral areas had several opportunities in rapidly changing environment after Lithuania gained its Independence in 1990. Interviews with local authorities allowed us to define three groups of residents and their potential to adapt to the labour market: those who are active, those who are passive and those who choose social benefits instead of a work salary. The survey results allowed us to predict that the ‘central-peripheral’ spatial structure will be one of the main factors influencing regional development in Lithuania in the near future.

Croatian Rural Futures in 2030: Four Alternative Scenarios for Postsocialist Countryside in the Newest E.U. Member State

“…Similarly, polarization processes between urban/metropolitan areas and rural areas have been identified in many NMS as negative impacts on intraregional cohesion and rural development (Gorton and others 2009;Binelli and Loveless 2016;Kisiała and Suszyńska 2017;Brambert and Kiniorska 2018;Pociūtė-Sereikienė and Kriaučiūnas 2018). They appear to be of particular importance even in the economically better-off NMS such as Slovenia (Cosier and others 2014), where studies on rural development also suggest that the strengthening of urban-rural links in terms of improving the employment and residential conditions, infrastructure, and access to services could bring mutual benefits to regional development of the county as a whole (Perpar 2014).…”

The impact of the oblast center on regional socio-economic development: the center-periphery dimension

“…Meanwhile, when examining the development of rural peripheral areas in Lithuania, G. Pociute-Sereikiene and E. Kriauciunas [14] predict that the centerperiphery spatial structure will in the nearest future become one of the main factors determining the priorities and impacting the regional development.…”