2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00185-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of the macrogamete and oocyst wall in Eimeria maxima: immuno-light and electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
118
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
16
118
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4B), a finding consistent with anti-EmGam56 localization within E. maxima macrogametes (13). In contrast, EtGFAT localization was more diffuse, and it is not clear whether the protein is restricted to any specific organelle (Fig.…”
Section: Fig 3 Relative Expression Of Etgfat In Different Developmesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4B), a finding consistent with anti-EmGam56 localization within E. maxima macrogametes (13). In contrast, EtGFAT localization was more diffuse, and it is not clear whether the protein is restricted to any specific organelle (Fig.…”
Section: Fig 3 Relative Expression Of Etgfat In Different Developmesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Microscopic analyses have consistently demonstrated that wall-forming bodies I (WFBI) and II (WFBII) form the outer and inner layers of the oocyst wall, respectively (4,13,32). Furthermore, several proteins have been identified that are detected both in macrogamete WFBs and in the oocyst wall.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anti-EmAPGA is a protein raised against affinity-purified gametocyte antigens (APGA) of E. maxima that recognizes the wall-forming bodies within the macrogamete and the oocyst wall (5).…”
Section: Fig 1 Apicomplexan Cell Division Flexibility (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A veil membrane was observed on the outer surface of the macrogamete of E. stiedai and this structure has been reported in only four other eimerian species, namely E. brunetti (Ferguson et al 1977), E. maxima Ferguson et al 2003) and E. acervulina (Pittilo and Ball 1984) all in the chicken, and E. bakuensis in sheep (Pittilo et al, 1988). The role of the veil in oocyst wall development is at present unknown (Mai et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%