2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Devil might wear Prada, but Narcissus wears counterfeit Gucci! How social adjustive functions influence counterfeit luxury purchases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2In both Studies 1 and 2, to ensure data quality, we restricted participation to MTurkers with 95% approval ratings (termed as workers with “high reputation”), following prior research (Ngo et al, 2020; Septianto et al, 2019). In particular, Peer et al (2014) stated “sampling high-reputation workers [95% approval ratings] can ensure high-quality data without having to resort to attention check questions” (Peer et al 2014, p.1023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2In both Studies 1 and 2, to ensure data quality, we restricted participation to MTurkers with 95% approval ratings (termed as workers with “high reputation”), following prior research (Ngo et al, 2020; Septianto et al, 2019). In particular, Peer et al (2014) stated “sampling high-reputation workers [95% approval ratings] can ensure high-quality data without having to resort to attention check questions” (Peer et al 2014, p.1023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although extant research has generally acknowledged attitude toward counterfeits as a salient variable affecting non‐deceptive counterfeit purchase behavior (Bhatia, 2018; Eisend & Tarrahi, 2019; Quoquab et al, 2017; Ting et al, 2016; Xi & Cheng, 2017), previous studies have not comprehensively examined the components of such attitudes—effectively missing are theoretically important and managerially controllable constructs that explain why consumers engage in such practices and, in turn, allow for potential company responses. For example, prior studies demonstrate that factors such as integrity (Eisend et al, 2017; Phau & Teah, 2009), materialism (Bhatia, 2018; Yoo & Lee, 2009), perceived quality (De Matos et al, 2007), smart shopper self‐perception (Eisend et al, 2017), subjective norms (Ngo et al, 2020; Thaichon & Quach, 2016), and value consciousness (Randhawa et al, 2015; Ting et al, 2016) may influence attitude toward counterfeit purchase. However, even though extant research has focused on counterfeit purchase behavior, it generally lacks inclusiveness, as conceptualizations of attitude toward counterfeits are usually limited to a few determinants (Viot et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luxury products are more desirable because customers perceive higher price as an indicator of high quality, wealth, and prestige. Moreover, paying a premium price for luxury goods has a positive impact on an individual's self-esteem (Ngo et al, 2020). In line with this claim, Veblen's (1899) theory of conspicuous consumption confirms that luxury products are used to signal one's wealth, power, and status to others.…”
Section: Financial Value and Luxury Value Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 88%