The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of a pre-loaded 1500 m treadmill timetrial, conducted in moderate normobaric hypoxia. Eight trained runners/ triathletes (24 ± 3 years, 73.2 ± 8.1 kg, 182.5 ± 6.5 cm, altitude specific V O2max: 52.9 ± 5.5 ml·kg -1 ·min -1 ) completed three trials (the first as a familiarisation), involving two, 15 minute running bouts at 45 % and 65 % V O2max, respectively, and a 1500 m time-trial in moderate normobaric hypoxia equivalent to a simulated altitude of 2500 m (FiO2 ~ 15 %). Heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, skeletal muscle and cerebral tissue oxygenation (StO2), expired gas (V O2 and V CO2), and ratings of perceived exertion were monitored. Running performance (Trial 1: 352.7 ± 40; Trial 2: 353.9 ± 38.2 s) demonstrated a low CV (0.9 %) and high ICC (1). All physiological variables demonstrated a global CV ≤ 4.2 %, and ICC ≥ 0.87, with the exception of muscle (CV 10.4 %; ICC 0.70) and cerebral (CV 4.1 %; ICC 0.82) StO2. These data demonstrate good reliability of the majority of physiological variables, and indicate that a preloaded 1500 m time-trial conducted in moderate normobaric hypoxia is a highly reliable test of performance.
IntroductionThe assessment of exercise performance is central to many investigations in the field of Sport and Exercise Science, allowing researchers to monitor the efficacy of a treatment or training schedule, compare different populations, and track performance over a particular time period. It is important to know the reliability of the performance test being applied, alongside accompanying physiological parameters, for similar conditions and participant cohorts, to allow accurate interpretation of results. This may include estimating the magnitude of a treatment effect, exploring individual differences, and calculating the smallest worthwhile effect [14].Likewise, knowledge of protocol reliability can help inform sample size estimations for future investigations [14].