2019
DOI: 10.15294/jejak.v12i1.16555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Difference of Enterprises Taxpayers Compliance after Tax Amnesty

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the compliance of enterprises taxpayers before and after the tax amnesty was applied in KPP Pratama South Jakarta. The research location was at KPP Pratama Jakarta Cilandak, KPP Pratama Jakarta Pancoran, KPP Pratama Jakarta Mampang, and KPP Pratama Jakarta Pasar Minggu. Data collection with documentation techniques, namely secondary data collection. Taxpayer’s compliance data for 2015, which is SPT as of March 2016, is assumed to be data before tax amnesty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, vocational high schools majoring in automotive have productive teachers in retreading tires, engines and vehicle frames. The sampling technique used purposive sampling because this determination technique in determining the sample of the productive teacher representatives from each VHS was considered [23]. To find out a large number of representative samples as the validity of the generalization process for this study, a sampling technique was used using the Slovin formula [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, vocational high schools majoring in automotive have productive teachers in retreading tires, engines and vehicle frames. The sampling technique used purposive sampling because this determination technique in determining the sample of the productive teacher representatives from each VHS was considered [23]. To find out a large number of representative samples as the validity of the generalization process for this study, a sampling technique was used using the Slovin formula [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The discovery of assets that are not reported from taxpayers who do not participate in the tax amnesty program so that the assets are added directly as income and subject to additional sanctions for not participating in the tax amnesty (Fitria et al, 2019).…”
Section: Imposition Of Sanctions Of 200% Of Income Tax For the Discovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selain itu banyaknya oknum yang memanfaatkan celah dan dana pemerintah untuk keperluan pribadinya membuat responden enggan untuk membayar pajak. (Fitria, 2019), menemukan dalam risetnya bahwa kepatuhan Wajib Pajak sebelum dan sesudah program Tax Amnesty sangat berbeda, dan Tax Amnesty ini dianggap dapat meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. (Sastri, 2018) dalam penelitiannya menemukan bahwa keterbukaan informasi antar lembaga, dan Pemeriksaan berpengaruh terhadap penerimaan, sedangkan pemutahiran sistem Teknologi Infromasi data perpajakan tidak berpengaruh terhadap penerimaan pajak.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified